Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Manali Shukla <manali.shukla@amd.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	pbonzini@redhat.com,  shuah@kernel.org, nikunj@amd.com,
	thomas.lendacky@amd.com,  vkuznets@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	babu.moger@amd.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 4/4] KVM: selftests: Add bus lock exit test
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 09:06:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZsyoEz9DMq2hZhV4@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002c7137-427e-4bd8-ae9e-04aab3995087@amd.com>

On Mon, Aug 26, 2024, Manali Shukla wrote:
> >> +struct buslock_test {
> >> +	unsigned char pad[126];
> >> +	atomic_long_t val;
> >> +} __packed;
> >> +
> >> +struct buslock_test test __cacheline_aligned;
> >> +
> >> +static __always_inline void buslock_atomic_add(int i, atomic_long_t *v)
> >> +{
> >> +	asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "addl %1,%0"
> >> +		     : "+m" (v->counter)
> >> +		     : "ir" (i) : "memory");
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void buslock_add(void)
> >> +{
> >> +	/*
> >> +	 * Increment a cache unaligned variable atomically.
> >> +	 * This should generate a bus lock exit.
> > 
> > So... this test doesn't actually verify that a bus lock exit occurs.  The userspace
> > side will eat an exit if one occurs, but there's literally not a single TEST_ASSERT()
> > in here.
> 
> Agreed, How about doing following?
> 
> +       for (;;) {
> +               struct ucall uc;
> +
> +               vcpu_run(vcpu);
> +
> +               if (run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO) {
> +                       switch (get_ucall(vcpu, &uc)) {
> +                       case UCALL_ABORT:
> +                               REPORT_GUEST_ASSERT(uc);
> +                               /* NOT REACHED */
> +                       case UCALL_SYNC:
> +                               break;
> +                       case UCALL_DONE:
> +                               goto done;
> +                       default:
> +                               TEST_FAIL("Unknown ucall 0x%lx.", uc.cmd);
> +                       }
> +               }
> +
> +               TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_X86_BUS_LOCK);

I doubt this works, the UCALL_SYNC above will fallthrough to this assert.  I
assume run->exit_reason needs a continue for UCALL_SYNC.

> +               TEST_ASSERT_EQ(run->flags, KVM_RUN_X86_BUS_LOCK);
> +               run->flags &= ~KVM_RUN_X86_BUS_LOCK;

No need, KVM should clear the flag if the exit isn't due to a bus lock.

> +               run->exit_reason = 0;

Again, no need, KVM should take care of resetting exit_reason.

> +       }
> 
> - Manali
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-26 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-09 17:51 [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Add support for the Bus Lock Threshold Manali Shukla
2024-07-09 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] x86/cpufeatures: Add CPUID feature bit " Manali Shukla
2024-08-16 19:37   ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-22  9:43     ` Manali Shukla
2024-08-29  6:48     ` Borislav Petkov
2024-08-30  4:42       ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-30  8:21         ` Borislav Petkov
2024-09-20  5:53           ` Manali Shukla
2024-07-09 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/4] KVM: SVM: Enable Bus lock threshold exit Manali Shukla
2024-08-16 19:54   ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-24  5:35     ` Manali Shukla
2024-08-26 16:15       ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-29  6:37         ` Manali Shukla
2024-08-28 16:44     ` Manali Shukla
2024-07-09 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] KVM: x86: nSVM: Implement support for nested Bus Lock Threshold Manali Shukla
2024-08-16 20:05   ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-28 15:52     ` Manali Shukla
2024-08-16 20:14   ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-29 14:32     ` Manali Shukla
2024-07-09 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/4] KVM: selftests: Add bus lock exit test Manali Shukla
2024-08-16 20:21   ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-26 10:29     ` Manali Shukla
2024-08-26 16:06       ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-08-29  9:41         ` Manali Shukla
2024-07-30  4:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Add support for the Bus Lock Threshold Manali Shukla
2024-08-07  3:55   ` Manali Shukla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZsyoEz9DMq2hZhV4@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manali.shukla@amd.com \
    --cc=nikunj@amd.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox