Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Vladimir Vdovin <deliran@verdict.gg>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org,
	horms@kernel.org, gnault@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10] net: ipv4: Cache pmtu for all packet paths if multipath enabled
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 13:28:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZzCY6kD4G2BVDNQs@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241108093427.317942-1-deliran@verdict.gg>

On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 09:34:24AM +0000, Vladimir Vdovin wrote:
> Check number of paths by fib_info_num_path(),
> and update_or_create_fnhe() for every path.
> Problem is that pmtu is cached only for the oif
> that has received icmp message "need to frag",
> other oifs will still try to use "default" iface mtu.
> 
> An example topology showing the problem:
> 
>                     |  host1
>                 +---------+
>                 |  dummy0 | 10.179.20.18/32  mtu9000
>                 +---------+
>         +-----------+----------------+
>     +---------+                     +---------+
>     | ens17f0 |  10.179.2.141/31    | ens17f1 |  10.179.2.13/31
>     +---------+                     +---------+
>         |    (all here have mtu 9000)    |
>     +------+                         +------+
>     | ro1  |  10.179.2.140/31        | ro2  |  10.179.2.12/31
>     +------+                         +------+
>         |                                |
> ---------+------------+-------------------+------
>                         |
>                     +-----+
>                     | ro3 | 10.10.10.10  mtu1500
>                     +-----+
>                         |
>     ========================================
>                 some networks
>     ========================================
>                         |
>                     +-----+
>                     | eth0| 10.10.30.30  mtu9000
>                     +-----+
>                         |  host2
> 
> host1 have enabled multipath and
> sysctl net.ipv4.fib_multipath_hash_policy = 1:
> 
> default proto static src 10.179.20.18
>         nexthop via 10.179.2.12 dev ens17f1 weight 1
>         nexthop via 10.179.2.140 dev ens17f0 weight 1
> 
> When host1 tries to do pmtud from 10.179.20.18/32 to host2,
> host1 receives at ens17f1 iface an icmp packet from ro3 that ro3 mtu=1500.
> And host1 caches it in nexthop exceptions cache.
> 
> Problem is that it is cached only for the iface that has received icmp,
> and there is no way that ro3 will send icmp msg to host1 via another path.
> 
> Host1 now have this routes to host2:
> 
> ip r g 10.10.30.30 sport 30000 dport 443
> 10.10.30.30 via 10.179.2.12 dev ens17f1 src 10.179.20.18 uid 0
>     cache expires 521sec mtu 1500
> 
> ip r g 10.10.30.30 sport 30033 dport 443
> 10.10.30.30 via 10.179.2.140 dev ens17f0 src 10.179.20.18 uid 0
>     cache
> 
> So when host1 tries again to reach host2 with mtu>1500,
> if packet flow is lucky enough to be hashed with oif=ens17f1 its ok,
> if oif=ens17f0 it blackholes and still gets icmp msgs from ro3 to ens17f1,
> until lucky day when ro3 will send it through another flow to ens17f0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Vdovin <deliran@verdict.gg>

Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-10 11:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-08  9:34 [PATCH net-next v10] net: ipv4: Cache pmtu for all packet paths if multipath enabled Vladimir Vdovin
2024-11-10 11:28 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2024-11-12  3:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZzCY6kD4G2BVDNQs@shredder \
    --to=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=deliran@verdict.gg \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gnault@redhat.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox