From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-il1-f182.google.com (mail-il1-f182.google.com [209.85.166.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC06576DCD for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 21:47:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="RPfIoOAo" Received: by mail-il1-f182.google.com with SMTP id e9e14a558f8ab-35fd4856abbso216605ab.0 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 13:47:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; t=1703195224; x=1703800024; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=T5CHLrR4EMTucnMkbYGinuiGUovrY8mvDNYXvJwsxgw=; b=RPfIoOAoE6D7eyHYl+GpQz7/QWupIcw/Ed9MePMcu3A0pErf4xCJFLKQ7Q3To7cc8w vuL0x47RqXTwRLBYhbTMwBPxL8pjE36ch5aOHHSHecnrxY7A017VOohgcVqbVnUaiRBF 18saKSseYHoigVk7cKBDJafC5MSXAtEfkwgU4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1703195224; x=1703800024; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=T5CHLrR4EMTucnMkbYGinuiGUovrY8mvDNYXvJwsxgw=; b=MSZxpAltGQ3KT9ExJ64ujqz3dgcth17dGOCrrgMhsYOSpKeHIUH6vok73KTRCM4vJv 5P/NllfAeK+7PtLmGQBr7a5DFlARn2JvdRkd8Cpst6RK1gFG+sf4vL1YlCgEGDOpR5gW lw658U+fbuZlTxVYP62izN7C8Kv3F/Mn6MK7RWL7mnJLisvIQAiAIlTo3DPbrRPBgl08 cp0qn+pwlDZIwAzOOFYGaBDlCwNNdPFsmUioksenq2JUD4fW+bKk+PSD62eYXbeyQ2Zg e0E5sx+p+Go4E8+gMKITgtnZNrerpKvjYqvT5rcv7CKhjuVVfRre/aEMXqc8qIkBgcZZ 33CQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw+PWY6VIdl0aqlTh+UCeknFZD12O4bu3Hwv3G50ESln/5Z+GxJ Dii5ZqfnUqFTkwWI2lf2T4ItjKiUlZqIwA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEoGSoXva572vluYRiQgTXBokcH749+S1X5DWwWq7246hcPsKVRMkiwq2VvJEFYIoQC+iRBqg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2bce:b0:7ba:9b12:35d2 with SMTP id s14-20020a0566022bce00b007ba9b1235d2mr250473iov.0.1703195223820; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 13:47:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.128] ([38.175.170.29]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x6-20020a056638034600b0046b6f096e3bsm677886jap.134.2023.12.21.13.47.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Dec 2023 13:47:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 14:47:02 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add some more cfg80211 and mac80211 kunit tests Content-Language: en-US To: Johannes Berg , benjamin@sipsolutions.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, David Gow , Brendan Higgins Cc: Benjamin Berg , Shuah Khan References: <20231220151952.415232-1-benjamin@sipsolutions.net> From: Shuah Khan In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/21/23 13:40, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2023-12-21 at 13:06 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On 12/21/23 12:39, Johannes Berg wrote: >>>> >>>> This patchset adds a couple of helpers for kunit as well as tests for >>>> cfg80211 and mac80211 that use them. >>> >>> I can take this through the wireless tree, but then I'd like to have >>> ACKs from kunit folks for the kunit patches: >>> >> >> We have run into conflicts in the past with the kunit tree. I take the >> kunit patches through linux-kselftest tree. I do want to make sure there >> are no conflicts. I don't mind taking these through my tree. > > OK, fair enough. > > If you can still put it into 6.8, then I think you can also take the > wireless tests, assuming they pass (I haven't run them in the posted > version). I don't think we'll have conflicts there, we don't have much > work in wireless that's likely to land for 6.8. > Sounds good. David, will you be able to look at these patches and let me know if I can apply for Linux 6.8-rc1. thanks, -- Shuah