From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f201.google.com (mail-pl1-f201.google.com [209.85.214.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 148642A1AA for ; Fri, 16 May 2025 13:35:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747402546; cv=none; b=o2RAod/gYThDwwtPutB0XtpE03h6Ucco/J2yGU8ma+SO1i8VyEJHoGqmPVEJAzkmCryczocyYVD5blBkkKui15EAAbO1v1HhBy2hlKprWCYyWOqOaFj3eXxFYRPgOQm6f5OpzA2J35ggPKr1ntreGedDisxtuoh7W7PiTw4D03c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747402546; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mbNJO6rbhRMwuIoVTU8ZDSG2mOIuj9eAx47BnBtUGTw=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=row8toJT/HqLQze+yl3wNASY12dHZbXVCmWSFXEFBctOSQLq01qztdGtdgHlZ3WZcmV4rt+vWG+BHUVqUTMF5miA44055cXQS3owQlcrQgLHpozFqP8pD9ac21VX9+FmO6HCj0etTdFOOiOvd6ARkTKDyN5UG2oR441vZJAw9XY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=XCZwYujY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="XCZwYujY" Received: by mail-pl1-f201.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-22fb8cfff31so16382835ad.1 for ; Fri, 16 May 2025 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1747402544; x=1748007344; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LnEPS5xIYcZ/9QBFlM2YvgXWlEvCitmvF/+QPuGAd2E=; b=XCZwYujYQfYJsx/wj/myE0yvEc3xR3IA8lSVucuBObUMrXF0cIxgmbGCIv0rkbooja xSeje9BnYXphJu5V8YW6g3C+pEvb9XPeeRzWczYqzkNtme49LMmGawLHABx5QNK2Kzur TLzRs5MURdmLNJ3sDfhFVD+RIIg1TgxHKgbhMKfcvQyycJvB/G5/0dADnJiOugPh45gH srDS0nC447YKE2NFgChNM9iNTe34/ArNk43WTAkuB03R8jFIL7yOgef67XMZUUaTaNLt nNEr4dE+N7eyVAcFYZxfCJImugtEfmd4CtbLkmBbZAYaDOHz+Qok1Fhu3poTvbDrxmqQ ZXkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1747402544; x=1748007344; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LnEPS5xIYcZ/9QBFlM2YvgXWlEvCitmvF/+QPuGAd2E=; b=Rg00Qj/O9cETCmYsCWHp3P3aYEfaSaj16zG5KC0cr6a9oPiXX0rFlRGLgbNVJMopl8 yXCUOeV6/AQn6a0eDGLUScB7Lhm4ff+nxDrq406RRcvCM7h7huqXRp5/PXgUg0+XunNq u4pWK2JIGcoYoBg6o5vxByQCkQUy5i1rUtVpScqB3XxIDaSZcwolOYjTueYRttGwbhnw UcydiQwFurR5WWo0YP58TBH68An1cbEnHDYlOZTPz+UOpOllfR76PdqM6eHetl0oNMUG vQj/flrfevXSn4rRwt/4FJ6+QF1bb0YeTIK0BcT3qTUS8Hi8brpTVNeWWei0v0DRJ1Zt aM1g== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVhhEEhVIRegZ8YDUNn2n612DnD2YWhu2bQdX1bCDbXvL8YklG4nn3v/h/fWxUclyFTB1G73c/tLhJpxlfroTQ=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxI7/uHMEJdMU7L6HcNFYtZSChSNOT+3Y0Bd/ZGQcdTOQEZlu1i 67ijoiQXwZ0KkR9T2lvZO/AzklE1AY/gpcIUanfoGXKNHF0mH5aa70Lez4T0qhACqWRVWnZmITS hEIe00A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGYPJLPbPNyk9fQYDfhkPqOAQlx8+ac872IbMGJ++7mqndtzn4UY6HAjcLA0ay95SrGo+cLkFm5AkA= X-Received: from plblm14.prod.google.com ([2002:a17:903:298e:b0:220:ca3c:96bc]) (user=seanjc job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a17:903:1ca:b0:221:78a1:27fb with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-231d438a223mr46909995ad.11.1747402544334; Fri, 16 May 2025 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 06:35:42 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20250324173121.1275209-25-mizhang@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20250324173121.1275209-1-mizhang@google.com> <20250324173121.1275209-25-mizhang@google.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 24/38] KVM: x86/pmu: Exclude PMU MSRs in vmx_get_passthrough_msr_slot() From: Sean Christopherson To: Mingwei Zhang Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Namhyung Kim , Paolo Bonzini , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , Liang@google.com, Kan , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Yongwei Ma , Xiong Zhang , Dapeng Mi , Jim Mattson , Sandipan Das , Zide Chen , Eranian Stephane , Shukla Manali , Nikunj Dadhania Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Mon, Mar 24, 2025, Mingwei Zhang wrote: > Reject PMU MSRs interception explicitly in > vmx_get_passthrough_msr_slot() since interception of PMU MSRs are > specially handled in intel_passthrough_pmu_msrs(). > > Signed-off-by: Mingwei Zhang > Co-developed-by: Dapeng Mi > Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi > --- > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 12 +++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > index 38ecf3c116bd..7bb16bed08da 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ module_param(allow_smaller_maxphyaddr, bool, S_IRUGO); > > /* > * List of MSRs that can be directly passed to the guest. > - * In addition to these x2apic, PT and LBR MSRs are handled specially. > + * In addition to these x2apic, PMU, PT and LBR MSRs are handled specially. > */ > static u32 vmx_possible_passthrough_msrs[MAX_POSSIBLE_PASSTHROUGH_MSRS] = { > MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, > @@ -691,6 +691,16 @@ static int vmx_get_passthrough_msr_slot(u32 msr) > case MSR_LBR_CORE_FROM ... MSR_LBR_CORE_FROM + 8: > case MSR_LBR_CORE_TO ... MSR_LBR_CORE_TO + 8: > /* LBR MSRs. These are handled in vmx_update_intercept_for_lbr_msrs() */ > + case MSR_IA32_PMC0 ... > + MSR_IA32_PMC0 + KVM_MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS - 1: > + case MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0 ... > + MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0 + KVM_MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS - 1: > + case MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 ... > + MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + KVM_MAX_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS - 1: > + case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS: > + case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL: > + case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL: > + /* PMU MSRs. These are handled in intel_passthrough_pmu_msrs() */ > return -ENOENT; > } This belongs in the patch that configures interception. A better split would be to have an Intel patch and an AMD patch, not three patches with logic splattered all over.