From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f201.google.com (mail-pf1-f201.google.com [209.85.210.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 865FC1A23B9 for ; Fri, 16 May 2025 14:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747406705; cv=none; b=oiREgVV9C8jb+za2TP67ZejZZXZlf+VRtj4u6lT4AuZaBvWK6gQuL7TWIARtxZaHvnCPcuOQLPRSc1OLjfQaM5GjI2iy8FZSf2Kh8pTSvE87oNvuhJd1wKFCzniEBsfegUDTk++urOgefX+kKxEJXWrypIPdld0b0MXprJa9SGo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747406705; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ai4HsUXe8Hf6sgaIpmcQ3fB9qzjUu4+7671cWfxzTsc=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=TvqrpnLBRP3P6fUstSDqAVS/QYtgulbGqUg7nUP4g/1CijfQQqnY+rmYGFk8TeK8N/XMfuIgVRMVzLyci+YxTfmLNRgdHJLTZjrZKsiKVg/PKmeOT/FNGMht/6v5ukgO7+tZL89K95u7Ltp/Dcx/BwoFan8X6AgPDsjC26MIKfo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=uH3oPosz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="uH3oPosz" Received: by mail-pf1-f201.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-7370e73f690so2515476b3a.3 for ; Fri, 16 May 2025 07:45:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1747406703; x=1748011503; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JxpWO6d9RGjAdSroDlrJKpnDNm7YQaegewDBnMK2Spc=; b=uH3oPosztB48FWUBaOZobTU4C6fJCfrxU1ukw5ExcGD3P1MTmO/z9rK38yiwd3NAqE nQj3zIXF5RS9LpfGka2ur2ZMa7WsXFpm3s4x2kDjsxiR6xUmMcRACBbaRRqPajI4zRY6 Bgl+y6NJAR/cXmCiqUlNTN+O/PEABZWf8yHOaIvW/EA7wJYyJoDMI+MSap1Urzj0CfmE n7g01DxrBstx+XiCDeNxWqSUPzM6iXoytAT2qFe8HhPcpa5dsLQleYQjqBqWyELYwVyQ mHBQa2rZh6cw1iUxF1zEJHw4euKXj1SGnQp15PCHS8uC66EjIp69sTdurH/5RFjJ3FR4 5Jfw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1747406703; x=1748011503; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JxpWO6d9RGjAdSroDlrJKpnDNm7YQaegewDBnMK2Spc=; b=Gc7rtq9vIBbSo4IUfKOQ+yJas3GmvFvM4zWRtI00wtBBW8wE8TgveGjCwVfmL/fnS8 up4habRmrxXXRBQ4Hzn8/igw6kbmYLPFYIM7A+gCBh6px4MBTydt09WETLI5naB7t8tV if+2G+ZqjCtM2yrgiVimtEHaTa/jOx8Xuep8cFOqe1b3x12eqPAtru8Uq9Twc9UeDp+j 9lEHbPsXOiDNyv6edyVfvMUFJ256oimJk6d93GRxw4dz6lWDhu+XYYaW2/tdnceR2xI+ t/9KUcJUKkVat59bhu1wkhVT9I3kBx2b3ewyZm8HGDWX9Ho5FPOrgO1n2T+pmni9rCg1 ilUA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWbg8kclt+vAX90FByZznOfhHDuZziW1gyKOcAGCEvyBx33oxOWtt6E6W6j/jOowyxOMBhS/ghCgqY3JvvESl0=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyYQDWkc0jW5BtqlPhyJnhCGkz2SfTerQIf6Hkn/c1mZQCdZ6rF XsNNxJ+L6iSU8Y/9xeuxKxWWQN3Gf6xjV00ksgJDMeVKsygLN/bNElXKjjMh3lW+ly+abJfQd2l dK3netg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFUIIMoWvWfo/p1yEuFxXr/0VSd/5n+vRtdSY5Ojpq4Jm9/+IMOBJg1hmy8i1Fg/Wi7gFvmjRxoy+4= X-Received: from pfbdf3.prod.google.com ([2002:a05:6a00:4703:b0:740:41eb:584c]) (user=seanjc job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a05:6a00:2e9b:b0:73e:1e21:b653 with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-742a978e6a3mr5100316b3a.5.1747406702664; Fri, 16 May 2025 07:45:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 07:45:01 -0700 In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20250324173121.1275209-1-mizhang@google.com> <20250324173121.1275209-25-mizhang@google.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 24/38] KVM: x86/pmu: Exclude PMU MSRs in vmx_get_passthrough_msr_slot() From: Sean Christopherson To: Mingwei Zhang Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Namhyung Kim , Paolo Bonzini , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , Liang@google.com, Kan , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Yongwei Ma , Xiong Zhang , Dapeng Mi , Jim Mattson , Sandipan Das , Zide Chen , Eranian Stephane , Shukla Manali , Nikunj Dadhania Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Fri, May 16, 2025, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2025, Mingwei Zhang wrote: > > Reject PMU MSRs interception explicitly in > > vmx_get_passthrough_msr_slot() since interception of PMU MSRs are > > specially handled in intel_passthrough_pmu_msrs(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Mingwei Zhang > > Co-developed-by: Dapeng Mi > > Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi > > --- > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 12 +++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > > index 38ecf3c116bd..7bb16bed08da 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > > @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ module_param(allow_smaller_maxphyaddr, bool, S_IRUGO); > > > > /* > > * List of MSRs that can be directly passed to the guest. > > - * In addition to these x2apic, PT and LBR MSRs are handled specially. > > + * In addition to these x2apic, PMU, PT and LBR MSRs are handled specially. Except y'all forgot to actually do the "special" handling, vmx_msr_filter_changed() needs to refresh the PMU MSR filters. Only the x2APIC MSRs are excluded from userspace filtering (see kvm_msr_allowed()), everything else can be intercepted by userespace. E.g. if an MSR filter is set _before_ PMU refresh, KVM's behavior will diverge from a filter that is set after PMU refresh. > > */ > > static u32 vmx_possible_passthrough_msrs[MAX_POSSIBLE_PASSTHROUGH_MSRS] = { > > MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, > > @@ -691,6 +691,16 @@ static int vmx_get_passthrough_msr_slot(u32 msr) > > case MSR_LBR_CORE_FROM ... MSR_LBR_CORE_FROM + 8: > > case MSR_LBR_CORE_TO ... MSR_LBR_CORE_TO + 8: > > /* LBR MSRs. These are handled in vmx_update_intercept_for_lbr_msrs() */ > > + case MSR_IA32_PMC0 ... > > + MSR_IA32_PMC0 + KVM_MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS - 1: > > + case MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0 ... > > + MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0 + KVM_MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS - 1: > > + case MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 ... > > + MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + KVM_MAX_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS - 1: > > + case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS: > > + case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL: > > + case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL: > > + /* PMU MSRs. These are handled in intel_passthrough_pmu_msrs() */ > > return -ENOENT; > > } > > This belongs in the patch that configures interception. A better split would be > to have an Intel patch and an AMD patch, I take that back, splitting the Intel and AMD logic makes is just as messy, because the control logic is very much shared between VMX and SVM.