Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yury Khrustalev <yury.khrustalev@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rick P. Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>,
	Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>,
	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
	Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, <jannh@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Wilco Dijkstra <wilco.dijkstra@arm.com>,
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 4/8] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3()
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 15:52:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aGVHoUQjJQBHREEJ@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250702-clone3-shadow-stack-v18-4-7965d2b694db@kernel.org>

On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 11:39:09AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Unlike with the normal stack there is no API for configuring the shadow
> stack for a new thread, instead the kernel will dynamically allocate a
> new shadow stack with the same size as the normal stack. This appears to
> be due to the shadow stack series having been in development since
> before the more extensible clone3() was added rather than anything more
> deliberate.
> 
> Add a parameter to clone3() specifying a shadow stack pointer to use
> for the new thread, this is inconsistent with the way we specify the
> normal stack but during review concerns were expressed about having to
> identify where the shadow stack pointer should be placed especially in
> cases where the shadow stack has been previously active.  If no shadow
> stack is specified then the existing implicit allocation behaviour is
> maintained.
> 
> If a shadow stack pointer is specified then it is required to have an
> architecture defined token placed on the stack, this will be consumed by
> the new task, the shadow stack is specified by pointing to this token.  If
> no valid token is present then this will be reported with -EINVAL.  This
> token prevents new threads being created pointing at the shadow stack of
> an existing running thread.  On architectures with support for userspace
> pivoting of shadow stacks it is expected that the same format and placement
> of tokens will be used, this is the case for arm64 and x86.
> 
> If the architecture does not support shadow stacks the shadow stack
> pointer must be not be specified, architectures that do support the
> feature are expected to enforce the same requirement on individual
> systems that lack shadow stack support.
> 
> Update the existing arm64 and x86 implementations to pay attention to
> the newly added arguments, in order to maintain compatibility we use the
> existing behaviour if no shadow stack is specified. Since we are now
> using more fields from the kernel_clone_args we pass that into the
> shadow stack code rather than individual fields.
> 
> Portions of the x86 architecture code were written by Rick Edgecombe.
> 
> Acked-by: Yury Khrustalev <yury.khrustalev@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Tested on a fast model with a WIP Glibc patch that uses extended version
of struct clone_args. No issues found, Glibc tests pass.

I used dummy syscall to detect support for shadow stack token in struct
clone_args.

Tested-by: Yury Khrustalev <yury.khrustalev@arm.com>

Kind regards,
Yury


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-02 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-02 10:39 [PATCH v18 0/8] fork: Support shadow stacks in clone3() Mark Brown
2025-07-02 10:39 ` [PATCH v18 1/8] arm64/gcs: Return a success value from gcs_alloc_thread_stack() Mark Brown
2025-07-02 10:39 ` [PATCH v18 2/8] Documentation: userspace-api: Add shadow stack API documentation Mark Brown
2025-07-02 10:39 ` [PATCH v18 3/8] selftests: Provide helper header for shadow stack testing Mark Brown
2025-07-02 10:39 ` [PATCH v18 4/8] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3() Mark Brown
2025-07-02 14:52   ` Yury Khrustalev [this message]
2025-07-02 10:39 ` [PATCH v18 5/8] selftests/clone3: Remove redundant flushes of output streams Mark Brown
2025-07-02 10:39 ` [PATCH v18 6/8] selftests/clone3: Factor more of main loop into test_clone3() Mark Brown
2025-07-02 10:39 ` [PATCH v18 7/8] selftests/clone3: Allow tests to flag if -E2BIG is a valid error code Mark Brown
2025-07-02 10:39 ` [PATCH v18 8/8] selftests/clone3: Test shadow stack support Mark Brown
2025-08-15 22:39 ` [PATCH v18 0/8] fork: Support shadow stacks in clone3() Edgecombe, Rick P

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aGVHoUQjJQBHREEJ@arm.com \
    --to=yury.khrustalev@arm.com \
    --cc=Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=debug@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=wilco.dijkstra@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox