From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51C14239573; Wed, 29 Oct 2025 17:00:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761757201; cv=none; b=tlUtkTDFuCL+2MxF7BUfBqyioXWa86USeZFoVgFOCWfXENMONY02djYZw5eXv6MCMSVovQKWj3hlr0oWaQA4gLebVVmHafFls7Ce0KXvzvr0xOnRMyV3IVJrX+uHzHPUMpeA3EmUPdiQNwdXSUAdfqcRUQleOzU/ktV06Ri+tmQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761757201; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HvrJnfTPdaNqtwSgq6WbH6vY0VW6uUPh2Z0MmsIdzmo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=QjWA7wS8suv9OCQTFF8aIMl0OGYZY2a3r3nkd80zUH4F7i1cMt0UpigSy7X2IwRJhcpn5bANA5uVEDb6t+q57gcGtsrFjPRXXgz8XHzqqq/Y0dZT7H/eTRt4vwuJShevcbW5urrXZFkxhaTopokK41G0gVoInSd/yWiLsAFRhEU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Acxm15kt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Acxm15kt" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07ABBC4CEF7; Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:59:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761757200; bh=HvrJnfTPdaNqtwSgq6WbH6vY0VW6uUPh2Z0MmsIdzmo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Acxm15ktlNKvc3SMEKvqhA30xNYFygbEQKdSFRa2RAFoJEZ9FDhLdF7Q5BJve5/+I HIvFpfwptKNFXVYP840zt34VqcBS+ohDMJxTH+wym7w06+2fhe4td8HQecSLjZMVmZ HLFXAxbacZsXhZgiWsTDbyN2o71effTWPDo7H8dBQW60Btmp2sdRWHZVZL+i/w5V5F HG2DxJZQ7U59/Yh5INwbJXlXdd+nrW8m/d11Cwnt42XrzYNzKEHYghPUYbfks/sdVr Tr2a+YM8ur1mFj4mi6TCR2c8dE5o+YmTDdai0oH6sKFWOXDnTglYtknXqFvWfw53f1 6vax4/30a6gsQ== Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:59:56 +0000 From: Simon Horman To: Bobby Eshleman Cc: Stefano Garzarella , Shuah Khan , Jakub Kicinski , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bobby Eshleman Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/12] selftests/vsock: identify and execute tests that can re-use VM Message-ID: References: <20251022-vsock-selftests-fixes-and-improvements-v1-0-edeb179d6463@meta.com> <20251022-vsock-selftests-fixes-and-improvements-v1-8-edeb179d6463@meta.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251022-vsock-selftests-fixes-and-improvements-v1-8-edeb179d6463@meta.com> On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 06:00:12PM -0700, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > From: Bobby Eshleman > > In preparation for future patches that introduce tests that cannot > re-use the same VM, add functions to identify those that *can* re-use a > VM. > > By continuing to re-use the same VM for these tests we can save time by > avoiding the delay of booting a VM for every test. > > Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman Reviewed-by: Simon Horman