From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25CE5625; Thu, 8 Jan 2026 15:57:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767887850; cv=none; b=ED/Gc/5pXPU88anic5HA+CvO07y7YXEJWIJ2/gjUOqB8/5Zq972PQ7QDCI9THfHo0k5lRJGnPZ4A9NZxjnCGmPbgrSigGmPK4uKOC1zwYq/UuTIwF0EpWP//PZ/OeXCWhH2+z+4GCvcaZtcc5k92g+iBkTVTYVqDTatJjxzrc+A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767887850; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ugz8wdo/6BEOG+khFJF1hZdX/nRQsHinmOapoZfspvI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=E8SCvPg+rh3KYQ0zBwBkVFjc9r/mQIz+h+1uJgtD20AT9S8UmrrNzlTeQf1AG+7L25RTzHzt43dPqgMO2Ckhp8waFlwd/1utBm2ieqTayfGZVhdRRFnGBxcy+2hztz17e1hfyoTaxP5awKQzlq7YiML0IySYVFbwgTVSCF6x2ZA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=nmJzzqIE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="nmJzzqIE" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 576DBC116D0; Thu, 8 Jan 2026 15:57:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1767887849; bh=ugz8wdo/6BEOG+khFJF1hZdX/nRQsHinmOapoZfspvI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nmJzzqIE4IxZRUNZpaA82BmsxC6pFmAomFHBeykBct/d2m/d6EbfBpIozT3vIEt58 NPWis4JayhrDP14cvBx9K8rB776JY4suj79SVX3Uv0TLnZJZkoFWmotc4SstZzN0rd hWMEIa39s1FZI0i9x7FT3+u1TbXbB1M42rE+jY7bAIdg+zYaqh89rOi+oMCBZpHajZ fbaS30dbcCz8wOucxN7jD5sN0Mqy2qKvv2OcIvGBhqWuQ92ZWH26oOS1NyzIBk7YYN X9Trl1zAt440AJ1mCv2RFbAADwxaBOVgy67pQk/jhY2QWMuwBUo5iC9VNtk3AzRLnL NoiGLjYLF+ocA== Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 16:57:26 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Joel Fernandes Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" , Boqun Feng , rcu@vger.kernel.org, Neeraj Upadhyay , Josh Triplett , Uladzislau Rezki , Steven Rostedt , Mathieu Desnoyers , Lai Jiangshan , Zqiang , Shuah Khan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 3/8] rcu/nocb: Remove unnecessary WakeOvfIsDeferred wake path Message-ID: References: <20260101163417.1065705-1-joelagnelf@nvidia.com> <20260101163417.1065705-4-joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20260101163417.1065705-4-joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Le Thu, Jan 01, 2026 at 11:34:12AM -0500, Joel Fernandes a écrit : > @@ -974,8 +959,7 @@ static bool do_nocb_deferred_wakeup_common(struct rcu_data *rdp_gp, > return false; > } > > - ndw = rdp_gp->nocb_defer_wakeup; > - ret = __wake_nocb_gp(rdp_gp, rdp, ndw == RCU_NOCB_WAKE_FORCE, flags); > + ret = __wake_nocb_gp(rdp_gp, rdp, false, flags); The force parameter can now be removed, right? (same applies to wake_nocb_gp()). Other than that: Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker -- Frederic Weisbecker SUSE Labs