From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D27A32868AB for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2026 13:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773235394; cv=none; b=FIVyMNDWjhjAARcfOY2zbGS34diKLFnPDjnwL3T3f7HiM+Bwex49Zl6qtMr+dJm0xBRVs7gyoouVVTaotm4AYgJ3k+pZoljlfyLExEoVcuwncjN5g7qjGKU/DDOxL4cyyca1gPSM6oZrsQy30hGQOb5La+udDqVGp74eo5pQaAQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773235394; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xlIe232Pjbgx5P/lvUuP/9vc3tHDKa9x4I9fpHA6aM0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gj0nZZnYFMCtij1j0Xuh61TIz5wy0b/puZVqQ8I1bVMFOiS3APWSFsVxfs/0HClkiiZbEvySpTuGgWPdFl0jw6jFQNIS1RCBejQwMcCqTnbay7B2LveHfj2YkoZ2pjH4NJow47pitxeJPbJwpt/e8KRnKcqrTLaJwxx8seZaoZk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=f/+ougkR; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=gP77C/9a; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="f/+ougkR"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="gP77C/9a" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1773235391; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YFU9zj5y+YlkWb3+Ey9JDNkm49VSOYC3zbNZmg5ZPAU=; b=f/+ougkRHCsi9EgeOvsJJRwRGyNWGOvusInGUyFinlhAhcftWjw0ayjDWWcLDqs9IolkC9 4eHMLulKnzkDHCq9JZrNLkharKwj+bY7sJwHdxnqGPgOGDn3gDXV81wzVTpKqgltyhmfNs a6cya438FW/bcQ9zqaWy3woI2bD7FjA= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-60-JpbXDwvMPO2jUVy5Sgv7vA-1; Wed, 11 Mar 2026 09:23:10 -0400 X-MC-Unique: JpbXDwvMPO2jUVy5Sgv7vA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: JpbXDwvMPO2jUVy5Sgv7vA_1773235390 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-485397788b3so40377465e9.2 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2026 06:23:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=google; t=1773235389; x=1773840189; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YFU9zj5y+YlkWb3+Ey9JDNkm49VSOYC3zbNZmg5ZPAU=; b=gP77C/9aSZAA8zX0R0Pfq2/W5dMW8tmbMSiWaDtYlFev4TO43QlHccoL0c/gfl5Cax TdcnvQ+yNdQWTvcPANQxchkCl3D0m2SjUqNorAi5aKlusa1fIxwk/bOmtrX9uEO60fJe /8k/PCi8zKCmY918djpoHxXK2HN320wdFa/W550lJfp4poLKakvS7dsAm67H4qrR/8he 8Z+6JLqlCp/ou6XZfEx+xGzfHJP3vbNGWu+gf0qWmxsGNoClGFv+k9ni4/1REYyDawZs GPcchbt5gxNhLLWjZMjY4FgoIHbZz6VA3VF43au3UIES9l7G1bhMhdRmlvXh5QViFHLL 35ng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1773235389; x=1773840189; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YFU9zj5y+YlkWb3+Ey9JDNkm49VSOYC3zbNZmg5ZPAU=; b=f+NWNY8hMcy8Hh5XIaM2ds+YrWiOq2PcPo0MDpH7KbkNZCYCAs4gZ0SGhTioWHAs7Z KINQhYIjb6txrzY+1Zkwhx2kdW/kSoIuG0zZGo2C3DNgJEtjhzDd/dJ/sOF7dE2rOoi2 92GpLFPmJqDcPqL3rPHQj17SJIe3Vx7O4fDmtJyKsLO3gQR7OyLgvrcnQOiM3iAbPJQC gT6YtJO38A/SiaxG3BJU+RfJ1hE/G3g44XMehkslmV/COx3T2BqdP9O3HhdnysmdnC+6 V3dgivGDOiJ1DQoVU3yMAQlBs9T3XAqWIOI6MCWXv9Q1IFxdpEgMi7+VGJh0HvM0kQuR oCxA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVkgUsdUcN6ZoCZ5cmLj8L7eQHXC1thq5iHt5J5JctmUXTChk5SISdyJkne+wzGXeCvlWPy5Ni7l18P5v5+iU4=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyYEB9JHNgu3OunpmVhD7pkftnHxwCd2/RId15TRziEj8PolTiq GBhckiEn9O7dY8S9tEmH75mXujXS5ua79PvBNKFbeDwwBusSIZK21fz/fKrVrAwaaig2vfFurFs NOIbvtx4B5Bc38YrWKu1OyUq9qt8Ygrl6owmLtMqyWeTuyxWP0epQdglUnwl20phEcSW5wg== X-Gm-Gg: ATEYQzxU6RwFtQyHRRrjAOmx4RkCCQhqA57WL1uEFotsUWzz8BeUouRrpXT88akM6dm Hhl1ETCwk5mNN7ar+v+MCg36VFwLGT4YbOctZCTmsk/VP6caBD0luXzoGuoiXOYXBvYwntyJMnE bZxFmT1Ul1gwmKK4GhPWzbCGD3yYQZhyME/yD1WCTHTUwWJcQPdR1+xgV9u0/+bkh1wXWxggAZv Z7/kV0e0pRyTsuGwAVsQdtDXUNpZtDhClehd9r8wkqVYlvjuivgTxAPQEPvcGdLzwhFzDqfLpdG 3xrtc/RNPFt/sSM2OUkO/El8uTUPghDOMAhSfV+I/gqQvntR5r87Wi0thUyyhLDFHVfNv47SrJw K+5L9G/oMdAIedgxD5QauZ21zOFBXQwwz7e7oh57ufFiKxBQewWQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1f87:b0:485:42ba:fc8 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4854b0a547cmr41170805e9.4.1773235389324; Wed, 11 Mar 2026 06:23:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1f87:b0:485:42ba:fc8 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4854b0a547cmr41169975e9.4.1773235388832; Wed, 11 Mar 2026 06:23:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb ([151.29.82.96]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-439f818d61esm7352427f8f.8.2026.03.11.06.23.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 11 Mar 2026 06:23:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 14:23:06 +0100 From: Juri Lelli To: Christian Loehle Cc: Shuah Khan , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Valentin Schneider , Clark Williams , Gabriele Monaco , Tommaso Cucinotta , Luca Abeni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/7] selftests/sched: Add SCHED_DEADLINE bandwidth tests to kselftest Message-ID: References: <20260306-upstream-deadline-kselftests-v1-0-2b23ef74c46a@redhat.com> <20260306-upstream-deadline-kselftests-v1-5-2b23ef74c46a@redhat.com> <129bb66c-74fa-4795-8d79-6c8e10a66e17@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <129bb66c-74fa-4795-8d79-6c8e10a66e17@arm.com> On 11/03/26 09:31, Christian Loehle wrote: > On 3/6/26 16:10, Juri Lelli wrote: ... > > + /* Start one cpuhog per CPU at max bandwidth */ > > + printf(" Starting %d cpuhog tasks at max bandwidth...\n", num_cpus); > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < num_cpus; i++) { > > + pids[i] = dl_create_cpuhog(runtime_ns, deadline_ns, period_ns, 0); > > + if (pids[i] < 0) { > > + printf(" Task %d failed to start: %s\n", > > + i + 1, strerror(errno)); > > + goto cleanup; > > + } > > + started++; > > + } > > Would it be okay to just have one task per max-cap CPU to make this pass on HMP? > Or something more sophisticated? > On HMP we should probably have max bandwidth hogs on big CPUs and then scale runtime (bandwidth) considering smaller CPUs capacities. Cannot quickly check atm, but that info (max cap per-CPU) is available somewhere in sys or proc, is it? Thanks, Juri