public inbox for linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	 Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	 David Gow <david@davidgow.net>, Rae Moar <raemoar63@gmail.com>,
	 Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
	driver-core@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] driver core: platform: remove software node on release()
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2026 21:24:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae2TMiUFAFd0-VuX@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=Mcq8rP-AerT-A2Az_W-rsMFZe8_rQDB5mKOHALxEn9uUw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 02:26:38PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 7:32 PM Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > +     /*
> > > +      * If the primary firmware node is a software node and there's no
> > > +      * secondary firmware node, the primary will be affected by the call
> > > +      * to device_remove_software_node() in platform_device_release() and
> > > +      * its reference count will be dropped by one. Take another reference
> > > +      * here to make it have no effect.
> > > +      */
> > > +     if (is_software_node(pdevinfo->fwnode) && !pdevinfo->swnode)
> > > +             fwnode_handle_get(pdevinfo->fwnode);
> >
> > It is possible to pass already registered node in pdevinfo->swnode
> > (because device_add_software_node() can handle this just fine). In this
> > case we also need to take an extra reference (or figure out whether we
> > need to drop the reference when removing the device).
> >
> 
> But device_add_software_node() checks if the software node is
> registered and - if so - just bumps the reference so the effect is the
> same as when it registers the swnode.

Ah, yes, you are right.

Still please check sashiko review - I think some of the concerns about
error unwinding are correct.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-26  4:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-23 12:12 [PATCH v2 0/3] driver core: remove software node from platform devices on device release Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-04-23 12:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] driver core: platform: remove software node on release() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-04-23 17:32   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2026-04-24 12:26     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-04-26  4:24       ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2026-04-24  9:01   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-24 12:34     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-04-24 13:13       ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-23 12:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] kunit: provide kunit_software_node_register() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-04-23 12:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] driver core: platform: tests: add test cases for correct swnode removal Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ae2TMiUFAFd0-VuX@google.com \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=brgl@kernel.org \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@davidgow.net \
    --cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raemoar63@gmail.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox