Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] killswitch: add per-function short-circuit mitigation primitive
Date: Sat, 9 May 2026 08:34:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <af8pw54Y-Q18kSR0@laps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ecjku6y7.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>

On Sat, May 09, 2026 at 02:02:24PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>* Sasha Levin:
>
>> When a kernel (security) issue goes public, fleets stay exposed until a patched
>> kernel is built, distributed, and rebooted into.
>>
>> For many such issues the simplest mitigation is to stop calling the buggy
>> function. Killswitch provides that. An admin writes:
>>
>>     echo "engage af_alg_sendmsg -1" \
>>         > /sys/kernel/security/killswitch/control
>>
>> After this, af_alg_sendmsg() returns -EPERM on every call without
>> running its body. The mitigation takes effect immediately, and is dropped on
>> the next reboot -- by which point a patched kernel is hopefully in place.
>
>Do you expect this to be safe to enable in kernel lockdown mode (i.e.,
>with typical Secure Boot configurations in distributions)?

Yes: under lockdown, killswitch has to be configured on the cmdline. Runtime
engage is gated on the new LOCKDOWN_KILLSWITCH reason.

I do need to resend a v3 that also gates disengage and the retval write so a
cmdline-installed mitigation is fixed for the boot - I didn't think about that
scenario.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha

      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-09 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-08 19:57 [PATCH v2] killswitch: add per-function short-circuit mitigation primitive Sasha Levin
2026-05-09 12:02 ` Florian Weimer
2026-05-09 12:34   ` Sasha Levin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=af8pw54Y-Q18kSR0@laps \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox