From: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, liam@infradead.org, jgg@ziepe.ca,
leon@kernel.org, david@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
vbabka@kernel.org, jannh@google.com, pfalcato@suse.de,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, usama.arif@linux.dev,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/mm/hmm-tests: test pagemap reads of PMD device-private entries
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 09:35:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ah1EI_JfZYop7VF8@lucifer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7750de96-44c6-47b0-b0a9-dd948fca2e90@arm.com>
On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 10:40:48AM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
>
>
> On 01/06/26 5:39 am, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > On 5/30/26 18:54, Dev Jain wrote:
> >> To cover pagemap paths scanning PMD entries, add assertions to check
> >> whether a device-private PMD entry has the correct pagemap information -
> >> the PM_SWAP bit must be on in the pagemap entry. Before that, we must
> >> assert through HMM_DMIRROR_SNAPSHOT snapshot that the leaf entry is
> >> at PMD level and not PTE level.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
> >> ---
> >> tools/testing/selftests/mm/hmm-tests.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hmm-tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hmm-tests.c
> >> index e1c8a679a4cf3..d09d4a9081de1 100644
> >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hmm-tests.c
> >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hmm-tests.c
> >> @@ -2276,8 +2276,11 @@ TEST_F(hmm, migrate_anon_huge_fault)
> >> unsigned long npages;
> >> unsigned long size;
> >> unsigned long i;
> >> + unsigned char *m;
> >> + uint64_t entry;
> >> void *old_ptr;
> >> void *map;
> >> + int pagemap_fd;
> >> int *ptr;
> >> int ret;
> >>
> >> @@ -2318,6 +2321,32 @@ TEST_F(hmm, migrate_anon_huge_fault)
> >> for (i = 0, ptr = buffer->mirror; i < size / sizeof(*ptr); ++i)
> >> ASSERT_EQ(ptr[i], i);
> >>
> >> + if (!hmm_is_coherent_type(variant->device_number)) {
> >> + ret = hmm_dmirror_cmd(self->fd, HMM_DMIRROR_SNAPSHOT,
> >> + buffer, npages);
> >> + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
> >> + ASSERT_EQ(buffer->cpages, npages);
> >> +
> >> + m = buffer->mirror;
> >> + for (i = 0; i < npages; ++i)
> >> + ASSERT_EQ(m[i], HMM_DMIRROR_PROT_DEV_PRIVATE_LOCAL |
> >> + HMM_DMIRROR_PROT_WRITE |
> >> + HMM_DMIRROR_PROT_PMD);
> >
> > madvise(..., MADV_HUGEPAGE) is not sufficient to guarantee that the allocation
> > was indeed converted to THP. Might be worth using the kpageflags interface (but that
> > requires elevated privileges) and then KPF_THP? Otherwise the HMM_DMIRROR_PROT_PMD
> > can be a miss from time to time. One other option is not to assert, but to check
> > and inform?
>
> I'll then use the existing check_huge_anon() to assert that a PMD THP got allocated.
Would MADV_COLLAPSE work here?
>
> >
> >> +
> >> + pagemap_fd = open("/proc/self/pagemap", O_RDONLY);
> >> + ASSERT_GE(pagemap_fd, 0);
> >> +
> >> + for (i = 0; i < npages; ++i) {
> >> + entry = pagemap_get_entry(pagemap_fd,
> >> + (char *)buffer->ptr + i * self->page_size);
> >> +
> >
> > If this is a THP entry, do we have valid pagemap entries for offset of i * page_size?
>
> Yep we do, see the populate_pagemap label in pagemap_pmd_range_thp.
>
> >
> >> + ASSERT_NE(entry & PM_SWAP, 0);
> >> + ASSERT_EQ(entry & PM_PRESENT, 0);
> >
> > Nit: You can use PAGEMAP_PRESENT()
>
> Okay.
>
> >
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + close(pagemap_fd);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> /* Fault pages back to system memory and check them. */
> >> for (i = 0, ptr = buffer->ptr; i < size / sizeof(*ptr); ++i)
> >> ASSERT_EQ(ptr[i], i);
> >
> > Balbir Singh
>
Cheers, Lorenzo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-01 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-30 8:54 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/hmm: A fix and a selftest Dev Jain
2026-05-30 8:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] fs/proc/task_mmu: do not warn on seeing non-migration pmd entry Dev Jain
2026-05-31 23:39 ` Balbir Singh
2026-06-01 8:36 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-05-30 8:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/mm/hmm-tests: test pagemap reads of PMD device-private entries Dev Jain
2026-06-01 0:09 ` Balbir Singh
2026-06-01 5:10 ` Dev Jain
2026-06-01 8:35 ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2026-06-01 9:14 ` Dev Jain
2026-05-31 19:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/hmm: A fix and a selftest Andrew Morton
2026-05-31 19:49 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-01 5:11 ` Dev Jain
2026-06-01 8:33 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ah1EI_JfZYop7VF8@lucifer \
--to=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox