Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Kinsburskii <skinsburskii@gmail.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: airlied@gmail.com, akhilesh@ee.iitb.ac.in,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net, dakr@kernel.org,
	david@kernel.org, decui@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com,
	kees@kernel.org, kys@microsoft.com, leon@kernel.org,
	liam@infradead.org, lizhi.hou@amd.com, ljs@kernel.org,
	longli@microsoft.com, lyude@redhat.com,
	maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mamin506@gmail.com,
	mhocko@suse.com, mripard@kernel.org,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, ogabbay@kernel.org,
	oleg@redhat.com, rppt@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
	simona@ffwll.ch, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, surenb@google.com,
	tzimmermann@suse.de, vbabka@kernel.org, wei.liu@kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] mm/hmm: add hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() for mmap lock-drop support
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:07:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alE028DsCGeUwNh6@skinsburskii> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710180312.GD1803712@ziepe.ca>

On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 03:03:12PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 10:02:55AM -0700, Stanislav Kinsburskii wrote:
> > The main customer for this new feature I have in mind is the MSHV driver
> > which backs VMs memory with HMM, requires userfaultfd support for
> > post-copy live migration and fast restore and it doesn't timeout.
> > 
> > I agree, that this current timeout value used by the other callers might
> > not be enough to repopulate the mappings with userfaultfd, but there
> > drivers would get -EFAULT for uderfaultfd-backed mappings without this
> > change anyway, so getting -EBUSY with the change instead doesn't look
> > like a significant change to the behaviour from my POV.
> 
> It sounds like it won't be reliable either then.
> 
> > > So, maybe the deadline should be resetting after every handled fault?
> > > ie the timeout really is only about the mmu notifier and we don't
> > > count the time spent handling faults or walking?
> >
> > The timeout was inherited from existing HMM users rather than introduced
> > as a new HMM policy. Some GPU drivers use HMM_RANGE_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT as a
> > budget for the whole range population operation, including HMM retries
> > and subsequent driver mapping work.
> 
> Yes, because we always had a timeout around the notifier because that
> scheme can sort of live lock. The timeout was to protect that only, ie
> limit the number of notifier retries.
> 
> Expanding the timeout to be outside what is bounded by the notifier
> retry is not right, and heavy stuff like mapping should be done after
> the hmm side succeeds and the notifiers concluded so they can rely on
> normal locking instead.
> 
> This is why I'm suggesting to reset the deadline as hmm makes forward
> progress, we really only want to bound the notifier retry loop not
> anything else.
> 

Sure, I'll modify accordingly.

Thanks,
Stanislav

> Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-10 18:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-07 19:46 [PATCH v7 0/8] mm/hmm: Add mmap lock-drop support for userfaultfd-backed mappings Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-07-07 19:46 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] mm/hmm: move page fault handling out of walk callbacks Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-07-10 16:31   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-07 19:47 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] mm/hmm: add hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() for mmap lock-drop support Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-07-10 16:27   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-10 16:47     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-10 17:02       ` Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-07-10 18:03         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-10 18:07           ` Stanislav Kinsburskii [this message]
2026-07-10 16:48     ` Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-07-10 16:38   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-10 17:06     ` Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-07-07 19:47 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] selftests/mm: add HMM tests for mmap lock-dropping faults Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-07-07 19:47 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] mshv: Use hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() for region faults Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-07-10 16:39   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-07 19:47 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] drm/nouveau: Use hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() for SVM faults Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-07-10 16:40   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-07 19:47 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] RDMA/umem: Use hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() for ODP faults Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-07-10 16:43   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-07 19:47 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] accel/amdxdna: Use hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() for range population Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-07-10 16:43   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-07 19:47 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] drm/gpusvm: Use hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() for range faults Stanislav Kinsburskii
2026-07-10 16:44   ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alE028DsCGeUwNh6@skinsburskii \
    --to=skinsburskii@gmail.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=akhilesh@ee.iitb.ac.in \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizhi.hou@amd.com \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=longli@microsoft.com \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mamin506@gmail.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ogabbay@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox