From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f49.google.com (mail-pj1-f49.google.com [209.85.216.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A36E38BF67 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2026 21:38:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.49 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784929130; cv=none; b=ExfTUYIWuzuI/BlUGBBp9zc2zTJ8hnJUO8IpFZ+uCgmFpk1NbwkCgmasihcpTu7dUkLIao3pUeALm0Ir9oLm6vyrYvomLYNZKdBMbkSy/E7k/Q9EaMZ6e5PvmmYnFcI3++bzHHkj9V5Ox5rut3oJEsooDlXvUd8Z32PV1L3K0Kk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784929130; c=relaxed/simple; bh=reffKocQBTkitR5sH3HXeyiSkGKFe33s9Gp2+pOr7MI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pH23Bl703sNlCvpbrrLTbHqV2eBafVC3c/YqSvIbGVv4TL9B+F4SOsHmtB6QHQpCL9LBujDhdg1hjfz2mqoH0THvdCMwD5UgYWjzasF64s29BHBUi+u+HSR9lRJ9RdtkIiuDR1pzRa9TrZXURRr+5ZX4aCru9QWZWdYvxU8N8Y4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=cHhlBdyb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.49 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="cHhlBdyb" Received: by mail-pj1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-38511175ad3so572822a91.2 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:38:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1784929129; x=1785533929; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=qq6JMFh0gDJiS/8lUoBGQxGZpE4+LKphNkGVGqdhJ2o=; b=cHhlBdyb8u9uML7p9GdcbuNl0Hd5d7hkhlI0/K6m+CrpbVxEBw4bxEyeJY348ih0s8 SpxjXMTc+UMnFffISf3fxkx5stI3R0DN3rrDyWrqwjRQ/H5+d+6gfs0wXlezI+xSIaIY klGQLjcQcjxAd9DOPHpsxvKlvfUxdNw1tR2ATVyYtD3WCXqz+oSgbRyFZ4/P8Rmx11+B OjxdKDgnGffVEoVrcGkwmGLRI9fng17P74GtgA4vM6Ik1xBIfwHRc//7UITxsxRQ3ns4 /GmSK4897kBMTuCf5/YMaHP94XwfZV22GApERO9ekjoEx4ZYt38zzcofbXAZdczCdzdC GZNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1784929129; x=1785533929; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=qq6JMFh0gDJiS/8lUoBGQxGZpE4+LKphNkGVGqdhJ2o=; b=mhnijWJAKJarGPK7tXSaAYcp2HqIRq9NccP906GyFmihBG8ob3tZ5+psqDa5IjzhkJ 22uveTtFl5oWEO1T6eE+088ns78c6eo+02KoCuX2JyQ5twQOhJaehosdPTVhdTvcNoda ngAcAuB+gWAgJu9he3h/WrduvVGA6eArV3tkYkzDV0xH0Wu52v/sTTK192Ih3s0N1sK/ RQloIvVhIzd0JBhVpE/4f3b5EDZak5GkQzxy0qLwqTYxL+Lw6zqVyeeZBFM9BIYzMEDB FH/STRCAJo3x6ibDTxNESgkC+FVRVCxXhP6mQHMDLUMu+0OMONTtypkGcqA4UZyBa47z i9Zg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+Rqss9zvZayrFub8tPaPowpcYcs2leXoe2bpzlyGGU/Oy9rkc/lJzDCBYLBe7T5SkW83EdPrJXBaKfurqoiR3nk=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyW6tK4G9e2Fv8jsfsjQdIki7BrRvrgFsdincxkHyXiAb6+/8xP H5dMfsyZNmOpc9mo6Hskws39WllxFN1na6aMw7wzlEjc0PC1lylXYvAE X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD13/U8XP+S2qNcPwywuthtrAwXy5c7/2xcs4ZB54tnjPi6oz+yA1aM/ghp9gFO5 KmPWMmmvuqR3l6M9HX6RNuItk/DZLRph2p67dGGCrDj/IChshcn6Hj2qF6aUD9BUv1FUXIphqHX BWq/PSlLUpRdUfSWayr09mKK1Dk650j8Sq57ItskysOPgwfM1qcdMnbr7s8RxRWbDV6ddbn2FKT UsrSh3Fy/UT6/QQ/AXvQoYJeIzaCBn9gpBEGE4k7bNlIpJxR3M0NKO/yGQjRYLjEA4BwI8cUoBQ 2OE9HmEblkMpxzUTHpA7Tq5Xc6xLQ3U9ZspYgakbM3sT2iy6tChzDCbzD78rqNaTM2XVRXvNr1C iZRb6F/qYQl0wE3YrKbuk1+C7ISKNXHAgo6Jlk1USUWnG14ayU2xNQpwN2BetcOmZkeitGEsczG 5nOK59XZc8B6ugIXiwul5PfA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3bce:b0:38e:e0b:320d with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-38f297812c8mr143723a91.41.1784929128727; Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:38:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from devvm29614.prn0.facebook.com ([2a03:2880:ff:2::]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-38f04175831sm2086519a91.11.2026.07.24.14.38.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:38:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:38:45 -0700 From: Bobby Eshleman To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Donald Hunter , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Andrew Lunn , Gerd Hoffmann , Vivek Kasireddy , Sumit Semwal , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Shuah Khan , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, razor@blackwall.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, almasrymina@google.com, matttbe@kernel.org, skhawaja@google.com, dw@davidwei.uk, Joe Damato , Bobby Eshleman Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 3/3] selftests/net: devmem.py: add check_rx_large_niov Message-ID: References: <20260708-tcpdm-large-niovs-v5-0-34bf6fac941b@meta.com> <20260708-tcpdm-large-niovs-v5-3-34bf6fac941b@meta.com> <20260721110903.34840531@kernel.org> <20260724143001.5afa8631@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260724143001.5afa8631@kernel.org> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 02:30:01PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:04:24 -0700 Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 11:09:03AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > On Wed, 08 Jul 2026 15:55:06 -0700 Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > > +@ksft_disruptive > > > > +def check_rx_large_niov(cfg) -> None: > > > > + """Run the devmem RX test with rx-buf-size = 16 KiB.""" > > > > + run_rx_large_niov(cfg) > > > > > > Any idea why the devmem tests sprinkle disruptive everywhere? > > > Disruptive means we take the link down, I don't think this test > > > does that. > > > > Talked to Stan and he mentioned the original idea was not necessarily > > just for link down, but any test that could be considered disruptive to > > other tests, with the idea to eventually introduce some scheduling > > (postpone disruptive until the end). > > Perhaps have such conversations on the list? IDK what Stan has in mind. For sure. @Stan, can you elaborate on the intent of @ksft_disruptive? > > > If we can get common agreement on its meaning, maybe I could submit > > something into the documentation and update where its misused? > > > > I'll drop it from this patch since it doesn't bring down the link (and > > seemingly no worries about check_rx_hds() tests not having it).