Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: "Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>,
	"Donald Hunter" <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
	"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	"Vivek Kasireddy" <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	sdf@fomichev.me, razor@blackwall.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	almasrymina@google.com, matttbe@kernel.org, skhawaja@google.com,
	dw@davidwei.uk, "Joe Damato" <joe@dama.to>,
	"Bobby Eshleman" <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 3/3] selftests/net: devmem.py: add check_rx_large_niov
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 15:13:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <amPjkerd2duU2DH4@devvm29614.prn0.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260724150716.07c49ad8@kernel.org>

On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 03:07:16PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:41:47 -0700 Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > > Talked to Stan and he mentioned the original idea was not necessarily
> > > > just for link down, but any test that could be considered disruptive to
> > > > other tests, with the idea to eventually introduce some scheduling
> > > > (postpone disruptive until the end).  
> > > 
> > > Perhaps have such conversations on the list? IDK what Stan has in mind.  
> > 
> > I don't have much to add so I didn't post on the list. In my mind, disruptive
> > started as "anything that can lead to a soft reset". But since the
> > sockets tend to survive these well, I do agree that your definition
> > of "link goes down" is a better fit.
> 
> My recollection was basically that the test is not safe to run over
> SSH (without tmux). Hence the link down concern. If we say soft reset
> that'd cover 95% of the tests so it's not very useful.
> 
> The existing doc and README already document the link down AFAICT.

Indeed, so I'll just test and confirm if devmem's existing
ksft_disruptive tests do or can cause link down, and submit a patch
removing for those that don't.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-24 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-08 22:55 [PATCH net-next v5 0/3] net: devmem: allow rx-buf-size > PAGE_SIZE per binding Bobby Eshleman
2026-07-08 22:55 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/3] net: devmem: allow rx-buf-size > PAGE_SIZE per dmabuf binding Bobby Eshleman
2026-07-21 18:07   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-07-23 23:58     ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-07-24 14:24       ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-07-24 16:39         ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-07-24 19:58           ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-07-24 21:11             ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-07-08 22:55 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/3] selftests/net: ncdevmem: add -b option to set rx-buf-size on bind Bobby Eshleman
2026-07-20 21:15   ` Mina Almasry
2026-07-21  0:28     ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-07-08 22:55 ` [PATCH net-next v5 3/3] selftests/net: devmem.py: add check_rx_large_niov Bobby Eshleman
2026-07-21 18:09   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-07-22  0:22     ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-07-24 21:04     ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-07-24 21:30       ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-07-24 21:38         ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-07-24 21:41         ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-24 22:07           ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-07-24 22:13             ` Bobby Eshleman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=amPjkerd2duU2DH4@devvm29614.prn0.facebook.com \
    --to=bobbyeshleman@gmail.com \
    --cc=almasrymina@google.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bobbyeshleman@meta.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=joe@dama.to \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    --cc=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhawaja@google.com \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox