From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2C79439F77; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 11:32:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787830366; cv=none; b=hRhA5mrUbwHWRke5qzaHwxUHF8/TzHwIDgQWz1A7eMqRfY079ZR5F1qNY8yud7RZ9il9FKNzxLXUGpyp/uUxDXBUbbbc1YWqT1jsUREqqSjqJwaqZNxXLFScEp4084XXt6wFrvrNv+AxSGJJGGVGUYak7tzze7hA2tUH1cy8zCs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787830366; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4Do58929PPd5JKLIOXUaMADe1o+gB6hP93zK/UUpV1k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Gb55VwB5mhCeNq/OjVQIpqal7m4/MstFmFRRUpSE/JLfoxWhB6VYc5ys/JCLkCXVY/1CaV23440CNhhccxiRJyYjnhpTwiYj9L/fuDRSsKlHyfVnK0L60VCQBK+dHkpBKosMLhUsm9YdPxFBUSDAQjn4BBB2Fae5PPcUCfmeUfA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=YCitKwHd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YCitKwHd" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A0F01F000E9; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 11:32:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1787830362; bh=6AAqqY4OkNSdQHM1gwmpJ5lzM2oTtRJv4IBEa3HgW1Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=YCitKwHdBmmXQATMfnf96emOBD0bNGuTQZCIGvu0mBP5yiU9dwKhEi7E5dIgZLcHH X1avs/xMwSZysmmH0oRRdopxhqfq2dOk4RJ+9AJXuoKQr2EqIy8AmdX1z5HoO44WyW K7hlAi6SMU+M7ZQN+RKm5BJCPeWL9QuDyF8tKg7WTPSjvTVzg/ydhecanXaRsHHNu9 +16jjMxfS6oKmZWvHz3diEiPMxOmv7LpcWhg9bsaekG079iYr0x8HSs8S6uoE5Cizg D4FriUW44WmRsndIj5Z2ZGPEI36T5HvQ/OKTQSCa6fsV5xiWP1N/ghqXAx+mRdhEug CETbX5v1Hinrw== Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 12:32:35 +0100 From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" To: Hajime Tazaki Cc: david@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, liam@infradead.org, rbm@suse.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, luto@amacapital.net, brendan.jackman@linux.dev, liuhangbin@gmail.com, corbet@lwn.net, kees@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com, rppt@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, vbabka@kernel.org, wad@chromium.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, daniel@thingy.jp Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] support kselftest on nommu platform Message-ID: References: <20260825015945.141739-1-thehajime@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 05:57:32PM +0900, Hajime Tazaki wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2026 17:49:58 +0900, > Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > > > BTW did > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260723093633.140989-12-johannes@sipsolutions.net/ > > go upstream? Or another UML nommu mode? I've not been keeping track of all > > that. > > The current consensus (IIUC) is above Johannes's patches are in > progress. Another mode which I was originally proposed is postponed > in order to minimize the impact to UM tree. Ah ok cool, thanks! Is that headed to 7.3 or more like 7.4? > > -- Hajime > -- Cheers, Lorenzo