From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
To: Zenghui Yu <zenghui.yu@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
david@kernel.org, liam@infradead.org, vbabka@kernel.org,
rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
shuah@kernel.org, ziy@nvidia.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
nico.pache@linux.dev, ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
baohua@kernel.org, lance.yang@linux.dev, usama.arif@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: remove unreachable returns after ksft exit helpers
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 15:04:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <apl-bS787dYOwTP-@gremlin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903135251.39593-1-zenghui.yu@linux.dev>
On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 09:52:51PM +0800, Zenghui Yu wrote:
> From: "Zenghui Yu (Huawei)" <zenghui.yu@linux.dev>
>
> The ksft_exit*() helpers such as ksft_exit_fail_msg() are declared
> __noreturn, and the ksft_exit() and ksft_finished() macros expand to calls
> of them, always terminating the process via exit(). Any return statements
> following such calls are unreachable, both at the end of main() and on
> error paths of helper functions.
>
> Remove all of them. No functional change.
>
> Assisted-by: GLM-5.3 OpenCode
Thanks for providing the tag, much appreciated :)
> Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu (Huawei) <zenghui.yu@linux.dev>
LGTM, so:
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/folio_split_race_test.c | 2 --
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/mlock-random-test.c | 1 -
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/pkey_sighandler_tests.c | 1 -
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c | 4 ----
> 4 files changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/folio_split_race_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/folio_split_race_test.c
> index 45b84f7b364e..1960635a953e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/folio_split_race_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/folio_split_race_test.c
> @@ -269,6 +269,4 @@ int main(void)
> NUM_ITERATIONS);
>
> ksft_exit(iter == NUM_ITERATIONS);
> -
> - return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mlock-random-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mlock-random-test.c
> index 16294bc7dae6..58772914fd79 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mlock-random-test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mlock-random-test.c
> @@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ int get_proc_locked_vm_size(void)
>
> fclose(f);
> ksft_exit_fail_msg("cannot parse VmLck in /proc/self/status: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> - return -1;
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/pkey_sighandler_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/pkey_sighandler_tests.c
> index 74bf79a5399d..f9c728ba96a5 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/pkey_sighandler_tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/pkey_sighandler_tests.c
> @@ -556,5 +556,4 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> }
>
> ksft_finished();
> - return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
> index 86a603692826..c01d227d7fd6 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,6 @@ static bool is_backed_by_folio(char *vaddr, int order, int pagemap_fd,
> return (pfn_flags & folio_tail_flags) != folio_tail_flags;
> fail:
> ksft_exit_fail_msg("Failed to get folio info\n");
> - return false;
> }
>
> static int check_after_split_folio_orders(char *vaddr_start, size_t len,
> @@ -548,7 +547,6 @@ static int create_pagecache_thp_and_fd(const char *testfile, size_t fd_size,
> err_out_unlink:
> unlink(testfile);
> ksft_exit_fail_msg("Failed to create large pagecache folios\n");
> - return -1;
> }
>
> static void split_thp_in_pagecache_to_order_at(size_t fd_size,
> @@ -711,6 +709,4 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> free(expected_orders);
>
> ksft_finished();
> -
> - return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.53.0
>
--
Cheers, Lorenzo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 13:52 [PATCH] selftests/mm: remove unreachable returns after ksft exit helpers Zenghui Yu
2026-09-03 14:04 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) [this message]
2026-09-04 0:44 ` SJ Park
2026-09-04 1:33 ` Zi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=apl-bS787dYOwTP-@gremlin \
--to=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=zenghui.yu@linux.dev \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox