From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj2-f12.google.com (mail-pj2-f12.google.com [74.125.227.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94FFB34FF78 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2026 05:12:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.227.140 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789189954; cv=none; b=Hc3VPV2rGpp62ULAvz2/0EBCqx7B9iGYMnM6rLkXXjc7PUOP7e4+BxpjH91nx7D1yCYQTymebh3En45fH0/eT1gEowm/g1IODe0SqWE1+sJ5vTdMm5eJaA4nyvszw8yloT8+0+1HdrKbxm0Af8wtt3ZERYd23uxjgZSnCmaLFzs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789189954; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yTcdsUmAFIRyyngXw0gHQk3+2epJRbLgUj5S5C/JgPY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=V42R97ulB2SuVlvAlMv+L9JhkVFkWOiq74o0VuBSqlIbEc727h1dwsfBDr83Qttko5VnoWZ5PwV5LlUEmtg4oJ/2qksPFnsbO4e0gOuVw9Z6+Y/ZNrj2oXjUet41Aj3J6CBVzNRmudxcMSfqmHFJR200Mo7r0BVju7RVbvfscvs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=WosihMCC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.227.140 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="WosihMCC" Received: by mail-pj2-f12.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-396ccda24a3so376290a91.0 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 22:12:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1789189953; x=1789794753; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=pQ7SKUX4iPc/e2EMSLENev8czab9Asgciu1sDxNwcDo=; b=WosihMCCJ+ocKbug+KiEZQ9CgV7rq7wecLhZ7WYnm0iOGw4PfZi8e5tk7xNttoKurs A137NJgcQ4FGU9ugBzXRy+5m14dEENtZ2jAzFZlruKAKRsz2O7x0FJJfSdCq0Qlmvg8t nJJKIPCu8FPs5gkGmFfoLHLKaBKegL/hqZ7RCqw8Gz6K670oAjBIu1CmZZJAivIOivdW NV0rhd5v6R3J8M3eYM3Cm7zApRT6+XgcHYbrC8zwmel2eBiqkdXBQci/hQQ7NfshNoLB Ik5JSa+S1RWGkhnt2p6j4byXaUYQHuOf3KzEAO1DXQC+nWqozNgN7U6hjX1gIxQS/9BB 65tw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1789189953; x=1789794753; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=pQ7SKUX4iPc/e2EMSLENev8czab9Asgciu1sDxNwcDo=; b=hqFFuEk/sYo7O2wnZ5zEIcGMkEaoitCU3x3qMv69QDEELwlecixAoRGRUHMbpecpv8 Kd8lL7uy8p7TRynjmlZJgadqURXvKdxqcKOSS/UpnIDWH1c7NX8ZklVLePRR8jEyrkwc CfKi8dBxIp6zRbp1SwqpLRxSkvjguhCJA4suG/NVrtVaiBFdP1Eiwe27dBYtVE7tZ+fX eUtJYFKzcU8vJzqqIqSsYeuJn5OwAnFWfozN2iouoArgTzJYVNngBXs27jATJag+uLSP Ix5Fw1XNvGI3Jbel8FjTPbuLtDodRK8mfRGWIEu62YaD4iQX3lGH5QudhUrdL1++MCex umIQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBxFH7hbi45y6Kc4DG59GBuSCCVUTqIUvFT7sh4T0vNfFMe9p52YCPq+YSBWZrgufoQSK8giuUh+OdLCZsOhQFc=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFuF++n350y1TNwmXmsExnSBBfflsgLUvl2y7nFOoBTraOTv3znC7OBh yETr9sGecoMqKrHcFrxQyiuWsZ+n4UWhcxRLXC2AVBHQEF7SPdtiLmx2 X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou2xU1MI7Fzb9KP0xGszditxl0Eiv4jvtRBgqWMQ1ppSMeVrB4mjp/eHFKlBwJ6 6m5PLXMVhfrna1FOOMK73Bca62t+To5gKzFtkfSG0g2jPUHxHR9KqdaxS8UOr35jlkc5OQnHH82 wPWChqp+GUBXYO1rYGEzPwXiNGVdel+ATlPnpzdtlztStTLjpWlEZbsweYLjyv61LqMbagvIl2r BgpLfJTiua7Uhr0y99vSM+t+HzYp/MgZxfPHmiQVxVZp5K3TNtptty4BWJ9HfB5hpZCHt2hzPf9 ERe70fB3qSA+mSUAy89z7m14026yg7jhed4hjpc5i94OsWdIZyN7ShkRoVJHPfS0CwwVnNZxgj2 mc84npCZRvI/ULERIsVkEw2RvvF6Uxwv0zWKW76rZVsx5zJhJePz7AWoht+DQj36m14JSorrOaE t3xAyYmkufcA6ZUnNK4OtT0vatfbHLRMI53Dl49KbRTruHG0eB3REGAbCAuqFmgO/BpLy5u5Q= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:bd7:b0:39d:ba21:fd90 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-39dba220361mr2148619a91.16.1789189952954; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 22:12:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com ([2a03:2880:7ff:57::]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-39d951d1056sm8134940a91.7.2026.09.11.22.12.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 11 Sep 2026 22:12:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 22:11:29 -0700 From: Narcisa Vasile To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Narcisa Vasile , netdev@vger.kernel.org, daniel.zahka@gmail.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, willemb@google.com, petrm@nvidia.com, anubhavsinggh@google.com, richardbgobert@gmail.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: drv-net: add BIG TCP test cases Message-ID: References: <20260911050659.13367-1-narcisav.kernel@gmail.com> <20260911100101.2c34bdc5@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260911100101.2c34bdc5@kernel.org> On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 10:01:01AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 10 Sep 2026 22:06:59 -0700 Narcisa Vasile wrote: > > Add four new test cases that validate coalescing > > under increased size limits (BIG TCP): > > Looks like SW is struggling to aggregate enough. Do we need longer > timeouts perhaps? Note that the debug kernel build includes > kernel/configs/debug.config > > AI says: > > Thanks for adding the BIG TCP coalescing coverage to gro_sw.py. CI is > flagging the new subtests as failing on our debug-kernel executor > (vmksft-net-drv-dbg, gro-sw-py): > > not ok gro_sw.test.ipv4_big_tcp_data_same > not ok gro_sw.test.ipv4_big_tcp_data_lrg_sml > not ok gro_sw.test.ipv4_big_tcp_tcp_seq > not ok gro_sw.test.ipv4_big_tcp_large_max > (and the ipv6 equivalents) > > The rx side never fully coalesces the injected segments before the > background receiver gives up and the test's retry loop (6 attempts) is > exhausted, e.g.: > > Expected {68952 }, Total 1 packets > Received {20280 [!=68952]40560 [!=0]8112 [!=0]}, Total 3 packets. I've run the tests in a loop on a slower system running a debug kernel using 10x the previous flush timeout and I still noticed retries every 10-20 iterations, so I've settled on 15x higher timeout to account for variability across different systems. 1..4 ok 1 gro_sw.test.ipv4_big_tcp_data_same ok 2 gro_sw.test.ipv4_big_tcp_data_lrg_sml ok 3 gro_sw.test.ipv4_big_tcp_tcp_seq ok 4 gro_sw.test.ipv4_big_tcp_large_max # Totals: pass:4 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0 1..4 ok 1 gro_sw.test.ipv6_big_tcp_data_same ok 2 gro_sw.test.ipv6_big_tcp_data_lrg_sml ok 3 gro_sw.test.ipv6_big_tcp_tcp_seq ok 4 gro_sw.test.ipv6_big_tcp_large_max # Totals: pass:4 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0 >