From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pbonzini at redhat.com (Paolo Bonzini) Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 13:20:03 +0200 Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM selftests for s390x In-Reply-To: <20190516111253.4494-1-thuth@redhat.com> References: <20190516111253.4494-1-thuth@redhat.com> Message-ID: On 16/05/19 13:12, Thomas Huth wrote: > This patch series enables the KVM selftests for s390x. As a first > test, the sync_regs from x86 has been adapted to s390x. > > Please note that the ucall() interface is not used yet - since > s390x neither has PIO nor MMIO, this needs some more work first > before it becomes usable (we likely should use a DIAG hypercall > here, which is what the sync_reg test is currently using, too...). No objections at all, though it would be like to have ucall plumbed in from the beginning. Paolo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pbonzini@redhat.com (Paolo Bonzini) Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 13:20:03 +0200 Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM selftests for s390x In-Reply-To: <20190516111253.4494-1-thuth@redhat.com> References: <20190516111253.4494-1-thuth@redhat.com> Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-ID: <20190520112003.x7PebC2k3VJc9bHkmdEdsE3SwmYTw3ev-xEmtdSqBTg@z> On 16/05/19 13:12, Thomas Huth wrote: > This patch series enables the KVM selftests for s390x. As a first > test, the sync_regs from x86 has been adapted to s390x. > > Please note that the ucall() interface is not used yet - since > s390x neither has PIO nor MMIO, this needs some more work first > before it becomes usable (we likely should use a DIAG hypercall > here, which is what the sync_reg test is currently using, too...). No objections at all, though it would be like to have ucall plumbed in from the beginning. Paolo