Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Vineet Agarwal <agarwal.vineet2006@gmail.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, ljs@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] selftests/mm: khugepaged: initialize file contents via mmap
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:19:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4fad2c6-f2c1-484e-b6a1-97e763a39ba8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0FA813EA-5EFA-482F-B8BF-FE65D4169C44@nvidia.com>

On 4/28/26 22:17, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 28 Apr 2026, at 16:07, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> 
>> On 4/28/26 21:56, Zi Yan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> This patch breaks the khugepaged test for READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS.
>>>
>>> When I ran sudo ./khugepaged all:file ~/ on ext4,
>>>
>>> collapse_max_ptes_none (khugepaged:file) fails.
>>
>> madvise() still works? Is it maybe because of dirty folios? (but that should
>> also be the case on write ...)
> 
> I asked codex instead.
> 
> Basically, mmap(MMAP_SHARED) makes the written folio dirty and the folio
> survives the later drop_caches. Adding msync() fixes the issue.

But why doesn't the write() make the folios dirty? Or are we running into some
race condition where the old code just worked by chance?

-- 
Cheers,

David

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-28 20:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-28 13:31 [PATCH v4] selftests/mm: khugepaged: initialize file contents via mmap Vineet Agarwal
2026-04-28 13:49 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-28 19:56 ` Zi Yan
2026-04-28 20:07   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-28 20:17     ` Zi Yan
2026-04-28 20:19       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-04-28 20:22         ` Zi Yan
2026-04-28 20:23           ` Zi Yan
2026-04-29  6:24             ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b4fad2c6-f2c1-484e-b6a1-97e763a39ba8@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=agarwal.vineet2006@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox