From: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
To: git@danielhodges.dev,bpf@vger.kernel.org,linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org,andrii@kernel.org,daniel@iogearbox.net,vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev,song@kernel.org,yatsenko@meta.com,martin.lau@linux.dev,eddyz87@gmail.com,haoluo@google.com,jolsa@kernel.org,john.fastabend@gmail.com,kpsingh@kernel.org,sdf@fomichev.me,yonghong.song@linux.dev,herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,davem@davemloft.net,git@danielhodges.dev,ast@kernel.org,andrii@kernel.org,daniel@iogearbox.net,martin.lau@kernel.org,eddyz87@gmail.com,yonghong.song@linux.dev,clm@meta.com,ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 1/4] bpf: Add hash kfunc for cryptographic hashing
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 21:06:39 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf515a9784c17b9b0dcfeff987e9cc7c328fc6d330cdb97b1cfe77448eafcc27@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260225202935.31986-2-git@danielhodges.dev>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3896 bytes --]
> diff --git a/crypto/bpf_crypto_shash.c b/crypto/bpf_crypto_shash.c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/crypto/bpf_crypto_shash.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/* Copyright (c) 2025 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/bpf_crypto.h>
> +#include <crypto/hash.h>
> +
> +struct bpf_shash_ctx {
> + struct crypto_shash *tfm;
> + struct shash_desc desc;
> +};
[ ... ]
> +static void *bpf_crypto_shash_alloc_tfm(const char *algo)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + ctx->tfm = tfm;
> + ctx->desc.tfm = tfm;
> +
> + return ctx;
> +}
[ ... ]
> +static int bpf_crypto_shash_hash(void *tfm, const u8 *data, u8 *out,
> + unsigned int len)
> +{
> + struct bpf_shash_ctx *ctx = tfm;
> +
> + return crypto_shash_digest(&ctx->desc, data, len, out);
> +}
bpf_crypto_shash_alloc_tfm() creates one bpf_shash_ctx per
bpf_crypto_ctx, with a single embedded shash_desc. Multiple BPF
programs can acquire references to the same bpf_crypto_ctx
concurrently via bpf_crypto_ctx_acquire() (which just does
refcount_inc_not_zero), and the hash kfunc is marked KF_RCU which
provides no mutual exclusion.
When two CPUs call bpf_crypto_hash() with the same context, both
end up in crypto_shash_digest() using the same desc:
CPU0 CPU1
bpf_crypto_hash(ctx) bpf_crypto_hash(ctx)
bpf_crypto_shash_hash() bpf_crypto_shash_hash()
crypto_shash_digest(desc) crypto_shash_digest(desc)
alg->digest(desc, ...) alg->digest(desc, ...)
// writes desc->__ctx // writes desc->__ctx
memset(desc->__ctx, 0) memset(desc->__ctx, 0)
crypto_shash_op_and_zero() in crypto/shash.c writes to
shash_desc_ctx(desc) via the algorithm callback and then zeroes it
with memset. Both CPUs race on this buffer, producing silently
corrupted hash output.
The existing encrypt/decrypt path does not have this problem because
crypto_lskcipher_encrypt() treats the tfm as read-only (the key
schedule is pre-computed) and the mutable IV state is passed
per-call through the siv dynptr.
Would it make sense to allocate a shash_desc per-call on the stack,
or use a per-cpu descriptor, to avoid this race?
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/crypto.c b/kernel/bpf/crypto.c
> --- a/kernel/bpf/crypto.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/crypto.c
[ ... ]
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRYPTO_HASH2)
> +/**
> + * bpf_crypto_hash() - Compute hash using configured context
> + * @ctx: The crypto context being used. The ctx must be a trusted pointer.
> + * @data: bpf_dynptr to the input data to hash. Must be a trusted pointer.
> + * @out: bpf_dynptr to the output buffer. Must be a trusted pointer.
> + *
> + * Computes hash of the input data using the crypto context. The output buffer
> + * must be at least as large as the digest size of the hash algorithm.
> + */
> +__bpf_kfunc int bpf_crypto_hash(struct bpf_crypto_ctx *ctx,
> + const struct bpf_dynptr *data,
> + const struct bpf_dynptr *out)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + return ctx->type->hash(ctx->tfm, data_ptr, out_ptr, data_len);
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_CRYPTO_HASH2 */
---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/22414975518
AI-authorship-score: low
AI-authorship-explanation: Eight revision iterations with active reviewer engagement on lore.kernel.org and incremental changes addressing feedback are consistent with human-driven development.
issues-found: 1
issue-severity-score: medium
issue-severity-explanation: Data race on shared shash_desc in bpf_crypto_hash() produces silently corrupted cryptographic hash output when two CPUs use the same context concurrently, which could affect integrity checking and authentication use cases.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-25 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-25 20:29 [PATCH bpf-next v8 0/4] Add cryptographic hash and signature verification kfuncs to BPF Daniel Hodges
2026-02-25 20:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 1/4] bpf: Add hash kfunc for cryptographic hashing Daniel Hodges
2026-02-25 21:06 ` bot+bpf-ci [this message]
2026-02-25 20:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 2/4] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_crypto_hash kfunc Daniel Hodges
2026-02-25 20:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 3/4] bpf: Add signature verification kfuncs Daniel Hodges
2026-02-25 21:06 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-02-25 20:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add tests for " Daniel Hodges
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bf515a9784c17b9b0dcfeff987e9cc7c328fc6d330cdb97b1cfe77448eafcc27@mail.kernel.org \
--to=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=git@danielhodges.dev \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
--cc=yatsenko@meta.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox