From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: shuah@kernel.org, Dave.Martin@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, babu.moger@amd.com,
ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, fenghuay@nvidia.com,
peternewman@google.com, zide.chen@intel.com,
dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, ben.horgan@arm.com,
yu.c.chen@intel.com, jason.zeng@intel.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] selftests/resctrl: Raise threshold at which MBM and PMU values are compared
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 19:34:46 +0200 (EET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c5dd1a0f-ed9d-d5c0-8b7a-25992ae713ab@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1bdca244a899a605c1ddd701a09d6a9d0c242856.1773432891.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3515 bytes --]
On Fri, 13 Mar 2026, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> commit 501cfdba0a40 ("selftests/resctrl: Do not compare performance
Should start with a capital letter.
> counters and resctrl at low bandwidth") introduced a threshold under which
> memory bandwidth values from MBM and performance counters are not compared.
> This is needed because MBM and the PMUs do not have an identical view of
> memory bandwidth since PMUs can count all memory traffic while MBM does not
> count "overhead" (for example RAS) traffic that cannot be attributed to an
> RMID. As a ratio this difference in view of memory bandwidth is pronounced
> at low memory bandwidths.
>
> The 750MiB threshold was chosen arbitrarily after comparisons on different
> platforms. Exposed to more platforms after introduction this threshold has
> proven to be inadequate.
>
> Having accurate comparison between performance counters and MBM requires
> careful management of system load as well as control of features that
> introduce extra memory traffic, for example, patrol scrub. This is not
> appropriate for the resctrl selftests that are intended to run on a
> variety of systems with various configurations.
>
> Increase the memory bandwidth threshold under which no comparison is made
> between performance counters and MBM. Add additional leniency by increasing
> the percentage of difference that will be tolerated between these counts.
>
> There is no impact to the validity of the resctrl selftests results as a
> measure of resctrl subsystem health.
>
> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> - Add Chen Yu's tag.
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
> index cd4c715b7ffd..39cee9898359 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
>
> #define RESULT_FILE_NAME "result_mba"
> #define NUM_OF_RUNS 5
> -#define MAX_DIFF_PERCENT 8
> +#define MAX_DIFF_PERCENT 15
> #define ALLOCATION_MAX 100
> #define ALLOCATION_MIN 10
> #define ALLOCATION_STEP 10
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
> index 58201f844740..6dbbc3b76003 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
> #include "resctrl.h"
>
> #define RESULT_FILE_NAME "result_mbm"
> -#define MAX_DIFF_PERCENT 8
> +#define MAX_DIFF_PERCENT 15
> #define NUM_OF_RUNS 5
>
> static int
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
> index 7f2ab28be857..3bad2d80c09b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
> * and MBM respectively, for instance generating "overhead" traffic which
> * is not counted against any specific RMID.
> */
> -#define THROTTLE_THRESHOLD 750
> +#define THROTTLE_THRESHOLD 2500
>
> /*
> * fill_buf_param: "fill_buf" benchmark parameters
>
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
--
i.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-27 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-13 20:32 [PATCH v3 00/10] selftests/resctrl: Fixes and improvements focused on Intel platforms Reinette Chatre
2026-03-13 20:32 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] selftests/resctrl: Improve accuracy of cache occupancy test Reinette Chatre
2026-03-26 12:44 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-13 20:32 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] selftests/resctrl: Reduce interference from L2 occupancy during " Reinette Chatre
2026-03-26 12:56 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-13 20:32 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] selftests/resctrl: Do not store iMC counter value in counter config structure Reinette Chatre
2026-03-13 20:32 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] selftests/resctrl: Prepare for parsing multiple events per iMC Reinette Chatre
2026-03-26 13:03 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-26 14:34 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-03-13 20:32 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] selftests/resctrl: Support multiple events associated with iMC Reinette Chatre
2026-03-27 17:28 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-13 20:32 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] selftests/resctrl: Increase size of buffer used in MBM and MBA tests Reinette Chatre
2026-03-27 17:30 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-13 20:32 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] selftests/resctrl: Raise threshold at which MBM and PMU values are compared Reinette Chatre
2026-03-27 17:34 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2026-03-27 23:19 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-03-13 20:32 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] selftests/resctrl: Remove requirement on cache miss rate Reinette Chatre
2026-03-27 17:45 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-27 23:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-03-31 8:07 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-31 17:39 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-03-13 20:32 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] selftests/resctrl: Simplify perf usage in CAT test Reinette Chatre
2026-03-27 17:47 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-13 20:32 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] selftests/resctrl: Reduce L2 impact on " Reinette Chatre
2026-03-27 17:49 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-27 23:22 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-03-31 19:13 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] selftests/resctrl: Fixes and improvements focused on Intel platforms Shuah Khan
2026-03-31 20:22 ` Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c5dd1a0f-ed9d-d5c0-8b7a-25992ae713ab@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jason.zeng@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox