Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] KVM: selftests: Fix Assertion on non-x86_64 platforms
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 15:07:22 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8e1594e-1379-4fb3-904f-fba2cd194cdc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231208033505.2930064-1-shahuang@redhat.com>

On 12/8/23 13:35, Shaoqin Huang wrote:
> When running the set_memory_region_test on arm64 platform, it causes the
> below assert:
> 
> ==== Test Assertion Failure ====
>    set_memory_region_test.c:355: r && errno == EINVAL
>    pid=40695 tid=40695 errno=0 - Success
>       1	0x0000000000401baf: test_invalid_memory_region_flags at set_memory_region_test.c:355
>       2	 (inlined by) main at set_memory_region_test.c:541
>       3	0x0000ffff951c879b: ?? ??:0
>       4	0x0000ffff951c886b: ?? ??:0
>       5	0x0000000000401caf: _start at ??:?
>    KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION should have failed on v2 only flag 0x2
> 
> This is because the arm64 platform also support the KVM_MEM_READONLY flag, but
> the current implementation add it into the supportd_flags only on x86_64
> platform, so this causes assert on other platform which also support the
> KVM_MEM_READONLY flag.
> 
> Fix it by using the __KVM_HAVE_READONLY_MEM macro to detect if the
> current platform support the KVM_MEM_READONLY, thus fix this problem on
> all other platform which support KVM_MEM_READONLY.
> 
> Fixes: 5d74316466f4 ("KVM: selftests: Add a memory region subtest to validate invalid flags")
> Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
> ---
> This patch is based on the latest kvm-next[1] branch.
> 
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git/log/?h=next
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c | 4 +++-
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-08  5:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-08  3:35 [PATCH v1] KVM: selftests: Fix Assertion on non-x86_64 platforms Shaoqin Huang
2023-12-08  5:07 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2023-12-08 16:21 ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c8e1594e-1379-4fb3-904f-fba2cd194cdc@redhat.com \
    --to=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox