Re: [PATCH 0/6] skip ENOTSUPP for BPF selftests

[Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>]

On Thu, 2024-07-04 at 14:48 +0800, Geliang Tang wrote:
> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> 
> BPF selftests seem to have not been fully tested on Loongarch
> platforms.
> There are so many "ENOTSUPP" (-524) errors when running BPF selftests
> on
> them since lacking BPF trampoline on Loongarch.
> 
> For these "ENOTSUPP" tests, it's better to skip them, instead of
> reporting
> some "ENOTSUPP" errors. This patchset skips ENOTSUPP in ASSERT_OK/
> ASSERT_OK_PTR/ASSERT_GE helpers to fix them. This is useful for
> running BPF
> selftests for other architectures too.

Superseded. v2 is just sent out.

Thanks,
-Geliang

> 
> Geliang Tang (6):
>   selftests/bpf: Define ENOTSUPP in testing_helpers.h
>   selftests/bpf: Skip ENOTSUPP in ASSERT_OK
>   selftests/bpf: Use ASSERT_OK to skip ENOTSUPP
>   selftests/bpf: Null checks for link in bpf_tcp_ca
>   selftests/bpf: Skip ENOTSUPP in ASSERT_OK_PTR
>   selftests/bpf: Skip ENOTSUPP in ASSERT_GE
> 
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c     | 20 +++++++++-------
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c |  2 +-
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c     | 10 +-------
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c  |  2 +-
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c        |  2 +-
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_addr.c      |  4 ----
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bprm_opts.c |  2 +-
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c       |  2 +-
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_ext.c      |  2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c       |  4 ----
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h      | 24 ++++++++++++++---
> --
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c   |  4 ----
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.h |  4 ++++
>  13 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>