Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>, shuah@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	ryan.roberts@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	Anshuman.Khandual@arm.com, DeepakKumar.Mishra@arm.com,
	aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sj@kernel.org,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND] [PATCH v6 0/2] Add test to distinguish between thread's signal mask and ucontext_t
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 01:07:37 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cfa882bf-a8dd-4b0a-98ea-4551a10df466@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241009051424.333380-1-dev.jain@arm.com>

On 10/8/24 23:14, Dev Jain wrote:
> This patch series is motivated by the following observation:
> 
> Raise a signal, jump to signal handler. The ucontext_t structure dumped
> by kernel to userspace has a uc_sigmask field having the mask of blocked
> signals. If you run a fresh minimalistic program doing this, this field
> is empty, even if you block some signals while registering the handler
> with sigaction().
> 
> Here is what the man-pages have to say:
> 
> sigaction(2): "sa_mask specifies a mask of signals which should be blocked
> (i.e., added to the signal mask of the thread in which the signal handler
> is invoked) during execution of the signal handler. In addition, the
> signal which triggered the handler will be blocked, unless the SA_NODEFER
> flag is used."
> 
> signal(7): Under "Execution of signal handlers", (1.3) implies:
> 
> "The thread's current signal mask is accessible via the ucontext_t
> object that is pointed to by the third argument of the signal handler."
> 
> But, (1.4) states:
> 
> "Any signals specified in act->sa_mask when registering the handler with
> sigprocmask(2) are added to the thread's signal mask.  The signal being
> delivered is also added to the signal mask, unless SA_NODEFER was
> specified when registering the handler.  These signals are thus blocked
> while the handler executes."
> 
> There clearly is no distinction being made in the man pages between
> "Thread's signal mask" and ucontext_t; this logically should imply
> that a signal blocked by populating struct sigaction should be visible
> in ucontext_t.
> 
> Here is what the kernel code does (for Aarch64):
> 
> do_signal() -> handle_signal() -> sigmask_to_save(), which returns
> &current->blocked, is passed to setup_rt_frame() -> setup_sigframe() ->
> __copy_to_user(). Hence, &current->blocked is copied to ucontext_t
> exposed to userspace. Returning back to handle_signal(),
> signal_setup_done() -> signal_delivered() -> sigorsets() and
> set_current_blocked() are responsible for using information from
> struct ksignal ksig, which was populated through the sigaction()
> system call in kernel/signal.c:
> copy_from_user(&new_sa.sa, act, sizeof(new_sa.sa)),
> to update &current->blocked; hence, the set of blocked signals for the
> current thread is updated AFTER the kernel dumps ucontext_t to
> userspace.
> 
> Assuming that the above is indeed the intended behaviour, because it
> semantically makes sense, since the signals blocked using sigaction()
> remain blocked only till the execution of the handler, and not in the
> context present before jumping to the handler (but nothing can be
> confirmed from the man-pages), the series introduces a test for
> mangling with uc_sigmask. I will send a separate series to fix the
> man-pages.
> 
> The proposed selftest has been tested out on Aarch32, Aarch64 and x86_64.
> 
> v5->v6:
>   - Drop renaming of sas.c
>   - Include the explanation from the cover letter in the changelog
>     for the second patch

These two patches have been languishing for sometime - hence I applied these
two patches to linux-kselftest next for Linux 6.13-rc1

thanks,
-- Shuah


      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-29  7:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-09  5:14 [RESEND] [PATCH v6 0/2] Add test to distinguish between thread's signal mask and ucontext_t Dev Jain
2024-10-09  5:14 ` [RESEND] [PATCH v6 1/2] selftests: Rename sigaltstack to generic signal Dev Jain
2024-10-09  5:14 ` [RESEND] [PATCH v6 2/2] selftests: Add a test mangling with uc_sigmask Dev Jain
2024-10-29  6:38 ` [RESEND] [PATCH v6 0/2] Add test to distinguish between thread's signal mask and ucontext_t Dev Jain
2024-10-29  7:07 ` Shuah Khan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cfa882bf-a8dd-4b0a-98ea-4551a10df466@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=Anshuman.Khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=DeepakKumar.Mishra@arm.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox