From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>, shuah@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
Anshuman.Khandual@arm.com, DeepakKumar.Mishra@arm.com,
aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sj@kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND] [PATCH v6 0/2] Add test to distinguish between thread's signal mask and ucontext_t
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 01:07:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cfa882bf-a8dd-4b0a-98ea-4551a10df466@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241009051424.333380-1-dev.jain@arm.com>
On 10/8/24 23:14, Dev Jain wrote:
> This patch series is motivated by the following observation:
>
> Raise a signal, jump to signal handler. The ucontext_t structure dumped
> by kernel to userspace has a uc_sigmask field having the mask of blocked
> signals. If you run a fresh minimalistic program doing this, this field
> is empty, even if you block some signals while registering the handler
> with sigaction().
>
> Here is what the man-pages have to say:
>
> sigaction(2): "sa_mask specifies a mask of signals which should be blocked
> (i.e., added to the signal mask of the thread in which the signal handler
> is invoked) during execution of the signal handler. In addition, the
> signal which triggered the handler will be blocked, unless the SA_NODEFER
> flag is used."
>
> signal(7): Under "Execution of signal handlers", (1.3) implies:
>
> "The thread's current signal mask is accessible via the ucontext_t
> object that is pointed to by the third argument of the signal handler."
>
> But, (1.4) states:
>
> "Any signals specified in act->sa_mask when registering the handler with
> sigprocmask(2) are added to the thread's signal mask. The signal being
> delivered is also added to the signal mask, unless SA_NODEFER was
> specified when registering the handler. These signals are thus blocked
> while the handler executes."
>
> There clearly is no distinction being made in the man pages between
> "Thread's signal mask" and ucontext_t; this logically should imply
> that a signal blocked by populating struct sigaction should be visible
> in ucontext_t.
>
> Here is what the kernel code does (for Aarch64):
>
> do_signal() -> handle_signal() -> sigmask_to_save(), which returns
> ¤t->blocked, is passed to setup_rt_frame() -> setup_sigframe() ->
> __copy_to_user(). Hence, ¤t->blocked is copied to ucontext_t
> exposed to userspace. Returning back to handle_signal(),
> signal_setup_done() -> signal_delivered() -> sigorsets() and
> set_current_blocked() are responsible for using information from
> struct ksignal ksig, which was populated through the sigaction()
> system call in kernel/signal.c:
> copy_from_user(&new_sa.sa, act, sizeof(new_sa.sa)),
> to update ¤t->blocked; hence, the set of blocked signals for the
> current thread is updated AFTER the kernel dumps ucontext_t to
> userspace.
>
> Assuming that the above is indeed the intended behaviour, because it
> semantically makes sense, since the signals blocked using sigaction()
> remain blocked only till the execution of the handler, and not in the
> context present before jumping to the handler (but nothing can be
> confirmed from the man-pages), the series introduces a test for
> mangling with uc_sigmask. I will send a separate series to fix the
> man-pages.
>
> The proposed selftest has been tested out on Aarch32, Aarch64 and x86_64.
>
> v5->v6:
> - Drop renaming of sas.c
> - Include the explanation from the cover letter in the changelog
> for the second patch
These two patches have been languishing for sometime - hence I applied these
two patches to linux-kselftest next for Linux 6.13-rc1
thanks,
-- Shuah
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-29 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-09 5:14 [RESEND] [PATCH v6 0/2] Add test to distinguish between thread's signal mask and ucontext_t Dev Jain
2024-10-09 5:14 ` [RESEND] [PATCH v6 1/2] selftests: Rename sigaltstack to generic signal Dev Jain
2024-10-09 5:14 ` [RESEND] [PATCH v6 2/2] selftests: Add a test mangling with uc_sigmask Dev Jain
2024-10-29 6:38 ` [RESEND] [PATCH v6 0/2] Add test to distinguish between thread's signal mask and ucontext_t Dev Jain
2024-10-29 7:07 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cfa882bf-a8dd-4b0a-98ea-4551a10df466@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Anshuman.Khandual@arm.com \
--cc=DeepakKumar.Mishra@arm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox