From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<x86@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] nSVM fixes and optional features
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 18:54:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d04eb3d1-9f0c-3b2c-c78f-0f377caadcfc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210914154825.104886-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
On 14/09/21 17:48, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Those are few patches I was working on lately, all somewhat related
> to the two CVEs that I found recently.
>
> First 7 patches fix various minor bugs that relate to these CVEs.
>
> The rest of the patches implement various optional SVM features,
> some of which the guest could enable anyway due to incorrect
> checking of virt_ext field.
>
> Last patch is somewhat an RFC, I would like to hear your opinion
> on that.
>
> I also implemented nested TSC scaling while at it.
>
> As for other optional SVM features here is my summary of few features
> I took a look at:
>
> X86_FEATURE_DECODEASSISTS:
> this feature should make it easier
> for the L1 to emulate an instruction on MMIO access, by not
> needing to read the guest memory but rather using the instruction
> bytes that the CPU already fetched.
>
> The challenge of implementing this is that we sometimes inject
> #PF and #NPT syntenically and in those cases we must be sure
> we set the correct instruction bytes.
>
> Also this feature adds assists for MOV CR/DR, INTn, and INVLPG,
> which aren't that interesting but must be supported as well to
> expose this feature to the nested guest.
>
> X86_FEATURE_VGIF
> Might allow the L2 to run the L3 a bit faster, but due to crazy complex
> logic we already have around int_ctl and vgif probably not worth it.
>
> X86_FEATURE_VMCBCLEAN
> Should just be enabled, because otherwise L1 doesn't even attempt
> to set the clean bits. But we need to know if we can take an
> advantage of these bits first.
>
> X86_FEATURE_FLUSHBYASID
> X86_FEATURE_AVIC
> These two features would be very good to enable, but that
> would require lots of work, and will be done eventually.
>
> There are few more nested SVM features that I didn't yet had a
> chance to take a look at.
>
> Best regards,
> Maxim Levitsky
>
> Maxim Levitsky (14):
> KVM: x86: nSVM: restore int_vector in svm_clear_vintr
> KVM: x86: selftests: test simultaneous uses of V_IRQ from L1 and L0
> KVM: x86: nSVM: test eax for 4K alignment for GP errata workaround
> KVM: x86: nSVM: don't copy pause related settings
> KVM: x86: nSVM: don't copy virt_ext from vmcb12
> KVM: x86: SVM: don't set VMLOAD/VMSAVE intercepts on vCPU reset
> KVM: x86: SVM: add warning for CVE-2021-3656
> KVM: x86: SVM: add module param to control LBR virtualization
> KVM: x86: nSVM: correctly virtualize LBR msrs when L2 is running
> KVM: x86: nSVM: implement nested LBR virtualization
> KVM: x86: nSVM: implement nested VMLOAD/VMSAVE
> KVM: x86: SVM: add module param to control TSC scaling
> KVM: x86: nSVM: implement nested TSC scaling
> KVM: x86: nSVM: support PAUSE filter threshold and count
>
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 105 +++++++--
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 218 +++++++++++++++---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h | 20 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
> .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test.c | 128 ++++++++++
> 8 files changed, 427 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test.c
>
Queued more patches, with 9-10-11-14 left now.
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-23 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-14 15:48 [PATCH 00/14] nSVM fixes and optional features Maxim Levitsky
2021-09-14 15:48 ` [PATCH 01/14] KVM: x86: nSVM: restore int_vector in svm_clear_vintr Maxim Levitsky
2021-09-23 14:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-14 15:48 ` [PATCH 02/14] KVM: x86: selftests: test simultaneous uses of V_IRQ from L1 and L0 Maxim Levitsky
2021-09-23 14:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-14 15:48 ` [PATCH 03/14] KVM: x86: nSVM: test eax for 4K alignment for GP errata workaround Maxim Levitsky
2021-09-23 14:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-14 15:48 ` [PATCH 04/14] KVM: x86: nSVM: don't copy pause related settings Maxim Levitsky
2021-09-14 15:48 ` [PATCH 05/14] KVM: x86: nSVM: don't copy virt_ext from vmcb12 Maxim Levitsky
2021-09-23 14:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-14 15:48 ` [PATCH 06/14] KVM: x86: SVM: don't set VMLOAD/VMSAVE intercepts on vCPU reset Maxim Levitsky
2021-09-23 16:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-14 15:48 ` [PATCH 07/14] KVM: x86: SVM: add warning for CVE-2021-3656 Maxim Levitsky
2021-09-23 16:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-12 0:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-10-11 17:30 ` Xiaoyao Li
2021-10-12 7:51 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-09-14 15:48 ` [PATCH 08/14] KVM: x86: SVM: add module param to control LBR virtualization Maxim Levitsky
2021-09-14 15:48 ` [PATCH 09/14] KVM: x86: nSVM: correctly virtualize LBR msrs when L2 is running Maxim Levitsky
2021-09-14 15:48 ` [PATCH 10/14] KVM: x86: nSVM: implement nested LBR virtualization Maxim Levitsky
2021-09-14 15:48 ` [PATCH 11/14] KVM: x86: nSVM: implement nested VMLOAD/VMSAVE Maxim Levitsky
2021-09-14 15:48 ` [PATCH 12/14] KVM: x86: SVM: add module param to control TSC scaling Maxim Levitsky
2021-09-14 15:48 ` [PATCH 13/14] KVM: x86: nSVM: implement nested " Maxim Levitsky
2021-09-14 15:48 ` [PATCH 14/14] KVM: x86: nSVM: support PAUSE filter threshold and count Maxim Levitsky
2021-09-23 16:54 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d04eb3d1-9f0c-3b2c-c78f-0f377caadcfc@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).