From: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas@t-8ch.de>
To: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>, arnd@arndb.de, w@1wt.eu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/17] selftests/nolibc: allow run with minimal kernel config
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 09:29:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d0d111ef-edae-4760-83fb-36db84278da1@t-8ch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0322e204-f3ea-4af2-a3eb-f23506b2d779@t-8ch.de>
On 2023-06-24 08:52:55+0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> As for the CONFIG_NET dependency, which I would guess is one of the more
> expensive configs to enable:
>
> link_cross can be easily adapted to instead use /proc/self.
>
> chmod_net relies on /proc/$PID/net accepting chmod().
> It is the only file in /proc/$PID/ that works that way.
>
> Maybe its a kernel bug anyways and we shouldn't rely on it anyways?
> I'm taking a look.
It indeed seems to be a kernel bug. The following patch aligns
/proc/$PID/net with all the other /proc/$PID stuff.
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_net.c b/fs/proc/proc_net.c
index a0c0419872e3..8c5e9abf4380 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_net.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_net.c
@@ -320,6 +320,7 @@ static int proc_tgid_net_getattr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
const struct inode_operations proc_net_inode_operations = {
.lookup = proc_tgid_net_lookup,
+ .setattr = proc_setattr,
.getattr = proc_tgid_net_getattr,
};
I'm not entirely sure about the process to synchronize the application
of the fix in the procfs tree and the fix/removal of the testcase in the
nolibc tree so we avoid broken states.
Or if this would technically be a (relevant) break of userspace ABI and
therefore has to stay as it is.
Any ideas?
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-24 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-21 12:52 [PATCH v1 00/17] selftests/nolibc: allow run with minimal kernel config Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-21 12:53 ` [PATCH v1 01/17] selftests/nolibc: stat_fault: silence NULL argument warning with glibc Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-21 12:54 ` [PATCH v1 02/17] selftests/nolibc: gettid: restore for glibc and musl Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-21 12:56 ` [PATCH v1 03/17] selftests/nolibc: add _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE for musl Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-21 12:57 ` [PATCH v1 04/17] selftests/nolibc: fix up kernel parameters support Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-21 12:58 ` [PATCH v1 05/17] selftests/nolibc: stat_timestamps: remove procfs dependency Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:59 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-29 16:56 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-06-29 21:23 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-29 21:44 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-06-21 13:00 ` [PATCH v1 06/17] tools/nolibc: add rmdir() support Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-21 13:01 ` [PATCH v1 07/17] selftests/nolibc: add a new rmdir() test case Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-21 13:03 ` [PATCH v1 08/17] selftests/nolibc: fix up failures when there is no procfs Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-21 13:04 ` [PATCH v1 09/17] selftests/nolibc: rename proc variable to has_proc Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-21 13:05 ` [PATCH v1 10/17] selftests/nolibc: rename euid0 variable to is_root Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-21 13:07 ` [PATCH v1 11/17] selftests/nolibc: prepare tmpfs and hugetlbfs Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-21 13:09 ` [PATCH v1 12/17] selftests/nolibc: rename chmod_net to chmod_good Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-21 13:11 ` [PATCH v1 13/17] selftests/nolibc: link_cross: support tmpfs Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-21 13:13 ` [PATCH v1 14/17] selftests/nolibc: rename chroot_exe to chroot_file Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-21 13:17 ` [PATCH v1 15/17] selftests/nolibc: vfprintf: silence memfd_create() warning Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-21 13:18 ` [PATCH v1 16/17] selftests/nolibc: vfprintf: skip if neither tmpfs nor hugetlbfs Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-21 13:21 ` [PATCH v1 17/17] selftests/nolibc: vfprintf: support tmpfs and hugetlbfs Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-21 19:21 ` [PATCH v1 00/17] selftests/nolibc: allow run with minimal kernel config Thomas Weißschuh
2023-06-22 18:45 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-24 6:52 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-06-24 7:29 ` Thomas Weißschuh [this message]
2023-06-24 8:39 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-24 8:54 ` Zhangjin Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d0d111ef-edae-4760-83fb-36db84278da1@t-8ch.de \
--to=thomas@t-8ch.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=falcon@tinylab.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox