Sashiko.dev for kselftest

Sashiko.dev for kselftest

[Shuah]

Hi Roman,

Please add linux-kselftest list to sashiko.dev for reviews.

There might be double coverage for patches cc'ed to lkml
and other lists such as mm, net, bpf etc. Hope that won't
cause problems.

thanks,
-- Shuah

Re: Sashiko.dev for kselftest

[Roman Gushchin]

Shuah <shuah@kernel.org> writes:

Hi Shuah,

Sure, will add later today.

> Hi Roman,
>
> Please add linux-kselftest list to sashiko.dev for reviews.
>
> There might be double coverage for patches cc'ed to lkml
> and other lists such as mm, net, bpf etc. Hope that won't
> cause problems.

It's not a problem at all.

What I believe might be a problem: kselftests are mostly userspace
code and at least some parts are written somewhat loosely (which
is totally fine for tests), so Sashiko will report a ton of issues,
many of them are not worth fixing.

So I guess it will be good to put down a kselftest-specific prompt with
some guidance what we believe is acceptable in tests code and what's not.

Thanks

Re: Sashiko.dev for kselftest

[Shuah Khan]

On 4/1/26 14:34, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Shuah <shuah@kernel.org> writes:
> 
> Hi Shuah,
> 
> Sure, will add later today.
> 
>> Hi Roman,
>>
>> Please add linux-kselftest list to sashiko.dev for reviews.
>>
>> There might be double coverage for patches cc'ed to lkml
>> and other lists such as mm, net, bpf etc. Hope that won't
>> cause problems.
> 
> It's not a problem at all.
> 
> What I believe might be a problem: kselftests are mostly userspace
> code and at least some parts are written somewhat loosely (which
> is totally fine for tests), so Sashiko will report a ton of issues,
> many of them are not worth fixing.

Good point. Maybe we can also find things that are worth fixing. It will
be an experiment.

> 
> So I guess it will be good to put down a kselftest-specific prompt with
> some guidance what we believe is acceptable in tests code and what's not.
> 

I can definitely do that depending on what we find.

thanks,
-- Shuah