From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C86921018F; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 21:40:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730842829; cv=none; b=Bs1/fKVdzeLrJGrrYF1hzJFl3zZM+MG7E5oytl7B5HgcbjUr/NOsg9wvUnJvusHgDUhNBdABKAtwl81wQk5wtvUoyag27oR98pUzi2Fv/0m1lJiUX3suLwCS3iDmK8E5UWfKSCES451nIOYD5KBv3hUoJtlLAJJSqENdIzdvu+0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730842829; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sPWg6NXelo6X0RNUXsDk9+fIwefuySugSVi62oMIVcc=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=nEk8DnEkVhwYiODMM30wgZGwi14zDad9lc7emi3SC51xrLVcCyLLLr9XZkY+s6gXKeWbDEXWiHqoTP+AZM3bK9vGfmkXoVshRW5WB1YErUqDb9PLbux8xRqsbdDgbS7C7+ZDFEvSxkXRo8maSsD+JYvpgsPzV+FLfzE4HEaqG3E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=awV7CbTd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="awV7CbTd" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C98E8C4CECF; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 21:40:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1730842829; bh=sPWg6NXelo6X0RNUXsDk9+fIwefuySugSVi62oMIVcc=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=awV7CbTdDY4DYsPokCKI8p9b6Ns/pZAYdKJuvtPaQdx1gw9nFIm8i7/EbWiP+Lw98 U1dTuJwMxzl+pGzGVf3d6h0DEETYnb85D5QD96P5ySZq+N3K65yfOQ2ZgXyd2bM2oE F4q5GodHKn9qgUBLQ3/9OCnlyCKVBx3s5wJ9SBeGcfFxdLbUkkC4X2VM7iECq5Jsx9 +sC/YAVsI2P9GWzrZLWACWmc4Qm09oiBttjemwciRAL3fXTgpaQNz2Img/Qs5lV3Pi 1o168w+gyqVMCczyyUFetEGmHtgbsScL6Pl/VeaF0mgpfHo45olAqAq820M7WuBcep CrArC+kyE0aAQ== Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:40:28 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] selftests: net: really check for bg process completion Content-Language: en-US To: Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Simon Horman , Shuah Khan , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org References: <0e6f213811f8e93a235307e683af8225cc6277ae.1730828007.git.pabeni@redhat.com> From: David Ahern In-Reply-To: <0e6f213811f8e93a235307e683af8225cc6277ae.1730828007.git.pabeni@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/5/24 11:23 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote: > A recent refactor transformed the check for process completion > in a true statement, due to a typo. > > As a result, the relevant test-case is unable to catch the > regression it was supposed to detect. > > Restore the correct condition. > > Fixes: 691bb4e49c98 ("selftests: net: avoid just another constant wait") > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni > --- > tools/testing/selftests/net/pmtu.sh | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > Reviewed-by: David Ahern