From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: wang lian <lianux.mm@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, richard.weiyang@gmail.com,
ziy@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] selftests/mm: check content to see whether mremap corrupt data
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 10:16:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <df27d5cc-bac8-47ee-a03d-eb1eff6dbe39@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250901081109.52460-1-lianux.mm@gmail.com>
On 01.09.25 10:11, wang lian wrote:
>
>> I'm confused, don't we have that exact check later in the function?
>
>> Your v1 might have been better, unless I am missing something.
>
> Hi David,
>
> Perhaps you missed this in the v1 feedback:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/E0C570E7-C4CD-4E41-9590-DDB64757CA2C@nvidia.com/ ?
We have:
/* smap does not show THPs after mremap, use kpageflags instead */
thp_size = 0;
for (i = 0; i < pagesize * 4; i++) {
if (pte_mapped[i] != (char)i)
ksft_exit_fail_msg("%ld byte corrupted\n", i);
if (i % pagesize == 0 &&
!is_backed_by_folio(&pte_mapped[i], 0, pagemap_fd, kpageflags_fd))
thp_size++;
}
Sure, it's after the split, but if mremap would have corrupted the pages, surely
it would still be corrupt after the mremap+split.
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-01 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-31 2:27 [Patch v2] selftests/mm: check content to see whether mremap corrupt data Wei Yang
2025-09-01 2:08 ` wang lian
2025-09-01 7:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 8:11 ` wang lian
2025-09-01 8:16 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-09-01 8:34 ` wang lian
2025-09-01 8:43 ` Wei Yang
2025-09-01 12:56 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-01 13:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 17:04 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-01 19:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-02 2:51 ` Wei Yang
2025-09-02 7:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-02 8:13 ` Wei Yang
2025-09-02 8:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-02 8:28 ` Wei Yang
2025-09-02 8:16 ` Wei Yang
2025-09-02 8:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-02 14:56 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-02 15:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-02 15:39 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-02 15:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-02 15:42 ` Zi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=df27d5cc-bac8-47ee-a03d-eb1eff6dbe39@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=lianux.mm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).