From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add selftests/x86 entry
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 13:57:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e03c9a30-bddd-4620-bd4f-024dc29d6328@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a32a8cdf-b488-4b6f-a0d9-d709b9beb769@linuxfoundation.org>
On 8/1/24 13:27, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 7/31/24 15:23, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 12:14:16PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> On 7/31/24 07:42, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>>>> Kind reminder
>>>>
>>>> On 7/2/24 3:17 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>>>>> Kind reminder
>>>
>>> Top post ???
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/10/24 10:28 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>>>>>> There are no maintainers specified for tools/testing/selftests/x86.
>>>>>> Shuah has mentioned [1] that the patches should go through x86 tree or
>>>>>> in special cases directly to Shuah's tree after getting ack-ed from x86
>>>>>> maintainers. Different people have been confused when sending patches as
>>>>>> correct maintainers aren't found by get_maintainer.pl script. Fix
>>>>>> this by adding entry to MAINTAINERS file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/90dc0dfc-4c67-4ea1-b705-0585d6e2ec47@linuxfoundation.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>>
>>>
>>> Applied to linux-kselftest next for Linux 6.12-rc1.
>>
>> You are applying things for the x86 entry, without an x86 ack, srsly?
>
> People are having problems with s86 selftests not making it to x86 lists.
> I figured it will make it easier for the x86 team.
>
> I don't have issues dropping this patch.
>
Dropped from my tree
thanks,
-- Shuah
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-01 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-10 5:28 [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add selftests/x86 entry Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-07-02 10:17 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-07-31 13:42 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-07-31 18:14 ` Shuah Khan
2024-07-31 21:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-08-01 19:27 ` Shuah Khan
2024-08-01 19:57 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2024-08-28 17:18 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e03c9a30-bddd-4620-bd4f-024dc29d6328@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox