From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from madrid.collaboradmins.com (madrid.collaboradmins.com [46.235.227.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DD761422AF; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 07:28:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720769339; cv=none; b=FQlN4U/odcMwy3kYO0fyFGyvlcTkQ0Ae4Un/DY2eW7U95N2QJX9dda06kXwlphNkAiUOm1f7If4jQboWVXG16xA050f9MQZAULPTqVBaRKalVnl/J7GH8LofXR5K3qQ4021hV3DTv+BtYNRGqwwOKj8ogJhMp+g4BFDTj6EC0+Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720769339; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tV2mmDK3KAW+lXwFxRwEDGe9QXWiyvrv2yC/DvWQ3Us=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Cc:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=BGTux8hCW4J7bqH30IDTmSajYrMdhCSonBHixzkXOMj7hzpMSWBUujNG+8c32fFPxnJFj+1rg2onp5PHojrj0QLdeqG6czxK8uUgPOyoGt7eaUPz/pKE0whC3A6c3Q299nslscSi7QwtSfGc6tfpgxs0k74yPm3g6wFB5lu1rng= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=rxRS5naC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="rxRS5naC" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1720769335; bh=tV2mmDK3KAW+lXwFxRwEDGe9QXWiyvrv2yC/DvWQ3Us=; h=Date:Cc:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=rxRS5naCevYotfqd66DoZjKyyYf2RAJj1Z33ZXk2XEhjqXyxb9JX0CTcGU6uh/PZ2 JoHaLiOs7cY1ycq1JZaKkeAgfCNkcC5fodw2VRJXQYOWjWPi3P/JSwAekSN7Lt+xtf dNmm15xKLw7bv5O9Qv8r4dvXFxpmoMO1clfNJB1vBD18jTMqssZ/FOwINuSng2zIiv MEWNAU7sFnm8nt0NloHo1VuTNfcn1ddYeKXuZs1KyvXJKRx0N7keqNi52P7wZu+7gb odvUOjv5Lw1AB6nn23sLuWfmDCptHvcrkOQHFwJpwX0c9PjIh3xLkLg+tq6uBRQchl YnmiZOJRFNJqA== Received: from [100.113.15.66] (ec2-34-240-57-77.eu-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com [34.240.57.77]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: usama.anjum) by madrid.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2DE1037821F8; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 07:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 12:28:50 +0500 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum , kernel@collabora.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests: x86: conform test to TAP format output To: Shuah Khan , "Chang S. Bae" , Binbin Wu , Ingo Molnar , "Kirill A. Shutemov" References: <20240426101824.2894574-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com> <890460a3-fd09-4f59-ab21-4f5b16256175@collabora.com> <0333bafc-295a-4fd8-8099-8fa8c6b0ae23@linuxfoundation.org> <0b731ef9-3110-44d8-b768-ccbf7585a08d@collabora.com> <390d33da-1676-4b01-a7d5-8b5c2cc6a3a9@linuxfoundation.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Muhammad Usama Anjum In-Reply-To: <390d33da-1676-4b01-a7d5-8b5c2cc6a3a9@linuxfoundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 7/11/24 9:39 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 7/11/24 00:52, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >> On 7/10/24 9:16 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: >>> On 7/10/24 03:37, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >>>> This patch brings just readability implements by using kselftests wrappers >>>> instead of manual pass/fail test cases counting. It has been on mailing >>>> list from several months now. Please can someone ack or nack? >>>> >>> >>> Okay. I think I responded to your other patches that are adding TAP >>> to individual tests when kselftest wrapped does it for you based on >>> return values. >> The current test doesn't return any exit value (hence implicitly always 0 >> is returned). The return value in addition to some other changes is getting >> fixed in this patch. > > Yes. Fixing the return the problems. Please send patches to do that > and I will take them. I'll send today. > > thanks, > -- Shuah > > -- BR, Muhammad Usama Anjum