Re: resctrl selftest patches ready for kselftest "next"

[Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>]

On 9/25/26 14:40, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Shuah,
> 
> On 9/25/26 1:07 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 9/25/26 01:56, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2026, 11:54 PM Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com <mailto:reinette.chatre@intel.com>> wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>>>      There are a couple of resctrl selftest patches that are ready for inclusion:
>>>
>>>      "selftests/resctrl: Skip L3_CAT when no exclusive cache portion exists"
>>>      https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260821003908.12977-1-icheng@nvidia.com/ <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260821003908.12977-1-icheng@nvidia.com/>
>>
>> Applied this to kselftest next branch.
> 
> Thank you very much.
> 
>>
>>>
>>>      "selftests/resctrl: Add dynamic linked list management for IMC counters"
>>>      https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260801092429.533956-1-wuyifan50@huawei.com/ <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260801092429.533956-1-wuyifan50@huawei.com/>
>>
>> This didn't apply. I am guessing picking this patch depends on others in this
>> series?
> Apologies for not being clear. I intended to request for the whole linked series to
> be included. When I try to do so all three patches from this series, specifically

No worries. I thought that is the case and just wanted to confirm before applying.

> 
> 	selftests/resctrl: Introduce linked list management for IMC counters
> 	selftests/resctrl: Replace counter index references with pointers
> 	selftests/resctrl: Enable dynamic management of IMC counters via linked list
> 
> applies cleanly on top of kselftest "next" branch, currently at,
> 

All 3 patches in the series are now in kselftest next for the next merge window.

thanks,
- Shuah