From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>,
Kernel Selftests <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: LKFT CI: improving Networking selftests results when validating stable kernels
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 16:49:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7b13e22-5241-4cdb-9c9a-1506b0066f0e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <226bc28f-d720-4bf9-90c9-ebdd4e711079@stanley.mountain>
Hi Dan,
On 15/11/2024 14:07, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 01:43:14PM +0100, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>> Regarding the other questions from my previous email -- skipped tests
>> (e.g. I think Netfilter tests are no longer validated), KVM,
>> notifications -- do you know who at Linaro could eventually look at them?
>>
>
> The skip tests were because they lead to hangs. We're going to look at those
> again to see if they're still an issue. And we're also going to try enable the
> other tests you mentioned.
Great, thank you!
For KVM (or similar), I guess it is not available, right? Some
time-sensitive tests might be unstable in such environment, and need to
be skipped.
For the notifications, do not hesitate to contact the corresponding
maintainers, the last people who modified the problematic selftests and
the netdev list. These "net" selftests are now better maintained, and
they are regularly validated on the development branches:
https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/status.html
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-15 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-08 18:21 LKFT CI: improving Networking selftests results when validating stable kernels Matthieu Baerts
2024-11-13 17:08 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-11-15 12:43 ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-11-15 13:07 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-11-15 15:49 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2024-11-13 18:33 ` Shuah Khan
2024-11-15 12:43 ` Matthieu Baerts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7b13e22-5241-4cdb-9c9a-1506b0066f0e@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkft@linaro.org \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox