From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-fw-80007.amazon.com (smtp-fw-80007.amazon.com [99.78.197.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41F714438E; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:06:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=99.78.197.218 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708355212; cv=none; b=OGiFqJL1iuaGE0SQTiOC4AMulURVSt9VM+nNE1PSM0rSlR4FV/SJ88rg+sKVYujKUUDQri64BctCt5/GjIdqXBzvKjSYnPX3ZQFNMkIUFyr0XGf0yXchYBiFrGv2H+QJs6FB0EVJf2U6TYilppN06rrCsMnFoWEptAlMhj6h1Tg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708355212; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wqP+GHbXy5y2dWwKO+f4tx8tvMyIzJowEbRtXjlanIk=; h=Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=EiJPF2m/ClkDi551lLlXH1KZLTdO6w+8QeIdfcyyqGGLemdEouC0ZPzh2K/1XEgHpUNIBMp2aNfEcVxIuUZcHnWlPkdzuGfDuTxOJxmQbPpGNHnEiqZRrZ1BEUtOhCPYUZIaxdm6MC/zsQUnhYPRsDsxMFsoKJ8SlYELtcf4GcQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=amazon.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=amazon.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazon.com header.i=@amazon.com header.b=Qpz1bX9X; arc=none smtp.client-ip=99.78.197.218 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=amazon.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=amazon.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazon.com header.i=@amazon.com header.b="Qpz1bX9X" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amazon.com; i=@amazon.com; q=dns/txt; s=amazon201209; t=1708355211; x=1739891211; h=message-id:date:mime-version:to:cc:references:from: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:subject; bh=7cweU86/OrAPAkRsQreyys1w+cw8bobHEMbIMZ1Hpos=; b=Qpz1bX9Xl4aUbr0p5akTMO7hEsz5LitMy1eeQl6h6we6dZz/v+ufkk+n 70mZHBhmDwsjJEmNJtzvI94LI8lpjhZh2X4XVv3h43DZXsCobo3esjmzE OQK4UlimmA+pYhB5ATL0T+FVBy2wJpi4yNo2UhuHI4jPNwNh3YiWTDH2d g=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,170,1705363200"; d="scan'208";a="275092583" Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mqueue: Set timeout to 100 seconds Received: from pdx4-co-svc-p1-lb2-vlan2.amazon.com (HELO smtpout.prod.us-east-1.prod.farcaster.email.amazon.dev) ([10.25.36.210]) by smtp-border-fw-80007.pdx80.corp.amazon.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Feb 2024 15:06:47 +0000 Received: from EX19MTAEUC002.ant.amazon.com [10.0.10.100:5821] by smtpin.naws.eu-west-1.prod.farcaster.email.amazon.dev [10.0.5.250:2525] with esmtp (Farcaster) id 210590fd-6fcd-4877-98d1-b8d96ef4e607; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:06:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Farcaster-Flow-ID: 210590fd-6fcd-4877-98d1-b8d96ef4e607 Received: from EX19D018EUA004.ant.amazon.com (10.252.50.85) by EX19MTAEUC002.ant.amazon.com (10.252.51.181) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1118.40; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:06:44 +0000 Received: from [192.168.11.164] (10.106.83.24) by EX19D018EUA004.ant.amazon.com (10.252.50.85) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1118.40; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:06:43 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:06:42 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: Kees Cook , SeongJae Park CC: , , , , , , , References: <20240209174243.74220-1-sj@kernel.org> <20240215011309.73168-1-sj@kernel.org> <202402161600.BF1D110BB@keescook> From: "Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem" In-Reply-To: <202402161600.BF1D110BB@keescook> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: EX19D006EUC001.ant.amazon.com (10.252.51.203) To EX19D018EUA004.ant.amazon.com (10.252.50.85) On 17/02/2024 00:01, Kees Cook wrote: > > Should it be 100 or 180? Either way: > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook > > -- > Kees Cook Both options may work, I am more inclined to have this as 180 seconds by giving more time for the test to finish, this can be reduced later to 100 or something else if we start hearing complains about the new timeout. Hazem