From: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
To: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: maddy@linux.ibm.com, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
venkat88@linux.ibm.com, yeswanth@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/8] powerpc64/bpf: fix compare instruction emitted for tailcall
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 22:54:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff0fafc4-6c36-4e48-a2af-b296874b20e2@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43017d115c0398b22284c38b2a30d53753560f7d.1785906979.git.skb99@linux.ibm.com>
On 05/08/26 11:37 am, Saket Kumar Bhaskar wrote:
> From: Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>
>
> The tail_call_info field can contain either a scalar counter
> value or a 64-bit pointer to the counter, using a 32-bit
> compare (cmplwi) only checks the lower 32 bits, which can lead
> to incorrect comparisions when location of counter is near 4GB
> boundary. Use instruction cmpldi/cmplwi for accurate comparision
> in corresponding cases.
>
> Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260517191450.85AE6C2BCB8@smtp.kernel.org/
> Fixes: 2ed2d8f6fb38 ("powerpc64/bpf: Support tailcalls with subprogs")
Acked-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Yeswanth Krishna Tellakula <yeswanth@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 8 ++++----
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
> index 6632de9871dd..af510da12d8e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
> @@ -188,6 +188,12 @@ struct codegen_context {
>
> #define bpf_to_ppc(r) (ctx->b2p[r])
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> +#define PPC_RAW_CMPLLI(a, i) PPC_RAW_CMPLDI(a, i)
> +#else
> +#define PPC_RAW_CMPLLI(a, i) PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(a, i)
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
> #define BPF_FIXUP_LEN 3 /* Three instructions => 12 bytes */
> #else
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index 5d559d613f3a..8be5ded13a4a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -768,7 +768,7 @@ static void bpf_trampoline_setup_tail_call_info(u32 *image, struct codegen_conte
> * Setting the tail_call_info in trampoline's frame
> * depending on if previous frame had value or reference.
> */
> - EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(_R3, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLLI(_R3, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
> PPC_BCC_CONST_SHORT(COND_GT, 8);
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(_R3, _R4, -BPF_PPC_TAILCALL));
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> index 951eb10ca1f6..e80312171aa7 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
> */
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2), _R1, 0));
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2), -(BPF_PPC_TAILCALL)));
> - EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLDI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
> PPC_BCC_CONST_SHORT(COND_GT, 8);
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2),
> -(BPF_PPC_TAILCALL)));
> @@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o
> PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_GE, out);
>
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), _R1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallinfo_offset(ctx)));
> - EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLDI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
> PPC_BCC_CONST_SHORT(COND_LE, 8);
>
> /* dereference TMP_REG_1 */
> @@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o
> * if (tail_call_info == MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
> * goto out;
> */
> - EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLDI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
> PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_EQ, out);
>
> /*
> @@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o
> * tail_call_info.
> */
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2), _R1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallinfo_offset(ctx)));
> - EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2), MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLDI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2), MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
> PPC_BCC_CONST_SHORT(COND_GT, 8);
>
> /* First get address of tail_call_info */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1785906979.git.skb99@linux.ibm.com>
2026-08-05 6:06 ` [PATCH v10 1/8] powerpc/bpf: fix alignment of long branch trampoline address Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-06 17:15 ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-05 6:06 ` [PATCH v10 2/8] powerpc/bpf: Move out dummy_tramp_addr after Long branch stub Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-06 17:18 ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-05 6:06 ` [PATCH v10 3/8] selftest/bpf: Fixing powerpc JIT disassembly failure Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-05 7:37 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-06 17:19 ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-06 17:20 ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-05 6:07 ` [PATCH v10 4/8] selftest/bpf: Enable verifier selftest for powerpc64 Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-05 7:07 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-06 17:22 ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-05 6:07 ` [PATCH v10 5/8] powerpc64/bpf: fix compare instruction emitted for tailcall Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-06 17:24 ` Hari Bathini [this message]
2026-08-05 6:07 ` [PATCH v10 6/8] selftest/bpf: Add tailcall verifier selftest for powerpc64 Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-05 6:07 ` [PATCH v10 7/8] powerpc/bpf: fix buffer overflow in JIT for large BPF programs Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-05 7:22 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-06 17:26 ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-05 6:07 ` [PATCH v10 8/8] powerpc64/bpf: fix percpu private stack leak on JIT failure Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-06 17:27 ` Hari Bathini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ff0fafc4-6c36-4e48-a2af-b296874b20e2@linux.ibm.com \
--to=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skb99@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yeswanth@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox