Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
To: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: maddy@linux.ibm.com, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, shuah@kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	venkat88@linux.ibm.com, yeswanth@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/8] powerpc64/bpf: fix compare instruction emitted for tailcall
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 22:54:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff0fafc4-6c36-4e48-a2af-b296874b20e2@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43017d115c0398b22284c38b2a30d53753560f7d.1785906979.git.skb99@linux.ibm.com>



On 05/08/26 11:37 am, Saket Kumar Bhaskar wrote:
> From: Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> The tail_call_info field can contain either a scalar counter
> value or a 64-bit pointer to the counter, using a 32-bit
> compare (cmplwi) only checks the lower 32 bits, which can lead
> to incorrect comparisions when location of counter is near 4GB
> boundary. Use instruction cmpldi/cmplwi for accurate comparision
> in corresponding cases.
> 
> Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260517191450.85AE6C2BCB8@smtp.kernel.org/
> Fixes: 2ed2d8f6fb38 ("powerpc64/bpf: Support tailcalls with subprogs")

Acked-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Yeswanth Krishna Tellakula <yeswanth@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h        | 6 ++++++
>   arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c   | 2 +-
>   arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 8 ++++----
>   3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
> index 6632de9871dd..af510da12d8e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
> @@ -188,6 +188,12 @@ struct codegen_context {
>   
>   #define bpf_to_ppc(r)	(ctx->b2p[r])
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> +#define PPC_RAW_CMPLLI(a, i)    PPC_RAW_CMPLDI(a, i)
> +#else
> +#define PPC_RAW_CMPLLI(a, i)    PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(a, i)
> +#endif
> +
>   #ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
>   #define BPF_FIXUP_LEN	3 /* Three instructions => 12 bytes */
>   #else
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index 5d559d613f3a..8be5ded13a4a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -768,7 +768,7 @@ static void bpf_trampoline_setup_tail_call_info(u32 *image, struct codegen_conte
>   		 * Setting the tail_call_info in trampoline's frame
>   		 * depending on if previous frame had value or reference.
>   		 */
> -		EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(_R3, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
> +		EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLLI(_R3, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
>   		PPC_BCC_CONST_SHORT(COND_GT, 8);
>   		EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(_R3, _R4, -BPF_PPC_TAILCALL));
>   
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> index 951eb10ca1f6..e80312171aa7 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
>   		 */
>   		EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2), _R1, 0));
>   		EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2), -(BPF_PPC_TAILCALL)));
> -		EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
> +		EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLDI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
>   		PPC_BCC_CONST_SHORT(COND_GT, 8);
>   		EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2),
>   								-(BPF_PPC_TAILCALL)));
> @@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o
>   	PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_GE, out);
>   
>   	EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), _R1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallinfo_offset(ctx)));
> -	EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
> +	EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLDI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
>   	PPC_BCC_CONST_SHORT(COND_LE, 8);
>   
>   	/* dereference TMP_REG_1 */
> @@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o
>   	 * if (tail_call_info == MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
>   	 *   goto out;
>   	 */
> -	EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
> +	EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLDI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
>   	PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_EQ, out);
>   
>   	/*
> @@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o
>   	 * tail_call_info.
>   	 */
>   	EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2), _R1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallinfo_offset(ctx)));
> -	EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2), MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
> +	EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLDI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2), MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
>   	PPC_BCC_CONST_SHORT(COND_GT, 8);
>   
>   	/* First get address of tail_call_info */


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-06 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1785906979.git.skb99@linux.ibm.com>
2026-08-05  6:06 ` [PATCH v10 1/8] powerpc/bpf: fix alignment of long branch trampoline address Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-06 17:15   ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-05  6:06 ` [PATCH v10 2/8] powerpc/bpf: Move out dummy_tramp_addr after Long branch stub Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-06 17:18   ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-05  6:06 ` [PATCH v10 3/8] selftest/bpf: Fixing powerpc JIT disassembly failure Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-05  7:37   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-06 17:19   ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-06 17:20     ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-05  6:07 ` [PATCH v10 4/8] selftest/bpf: Enable verifier selftest for powerpc64 Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-05  7:07   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-06 17:22   ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-05  6:07 ` [PATCH v10 5/8] powerpc64/bpf: fix compare instruction emitted for tailcall Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-06 17:24   ` Hari Bathini [this message]
2026-08-05  6:07 ` [PATCH v10 6/8] selftest/bpf: Add tailcall verifier selftest for powerpc64 Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-05  6:07 ` [PATCH v10 7/8] powerpc/bpf: fix buffer overflow in JIT for large BPF programs Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-05  7:22   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-06 17:26   ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-05  6:07 ` [PATCH v10 8/8] powerpc64/bpf: fix percpu private stack leak on JIT failure Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-06 17:27   ` Hari Bathini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ff0fafc4-6c36-4e48-a2af-b296874b20e2@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skb99@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=yeswanth@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox