From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4249CC34026 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E4A2173E for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="IxudEPiX" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726599AbgBRMr6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 07:47:58 -0500 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]:35876 "EHLO lelv0143.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726595AbgBRMr6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 07:47:58 -0500 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01ICltSI017329; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 06:47:55 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1582030075; bh=xVEyUW1XdjD1ES7xYnuISdMvDkFO7eHR+YedhiMAABo=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=IxudEPiXN/PX6W1z0gwhqR0tT6NV2oiqd/p8N17e+bYDgcG95nilbG3RYwVxJuAJe 8SF3+l5tFNzVVGpyblUwrM7K+9smlqZiy6NCEO9fQxe/8WBSuAtq2pBxdkHELcJYXL RA3fK40Qm8njUSKNtaw27MS2dBCBtRXBuqlVgPGg= Received: from DFLE112.ent.ti.com (dfle112.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.33]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 01IClt24016380 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 06:47:55 -0600 Received: from DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) by DFLE112.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 06:47:55 -0600 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 06:47:55 -0600 Received: from [10.250.65.13] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01ICltr0062821; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 06:47:55 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] leds: add support for apa102c leds To: Nicolas Belin , , , , References: <1582018657-5720-1-git-send-email-nbelin@baylibre.com> From: Dan Murphy Message-ID: <04642127-0e68-43b1-9b6c-0dbb56dc9bfe@ti.com> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 06:43:12 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1582018657-5720-1-git-send-email-nbelin@baylibre.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-leds-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org Hellp On 2/18/20 3:37 AM, Nicolas Belin wrote: > This patch series adds the driver and its related documentation > for the APA102C RGB Leds. > > Patch 1 adds the APA102C led manufacturer to the vendor-prefixes list. > > Patch 2 Documents the APA102C led driver. > > Patch 3 contains the actual driver code and modifications in the Kconfig > and the Makefile. Is this something that can benefit from the Multicolor framework patches? https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=427513 Can you RFC the APA102C driver on top of the Multicolor FW to see how it blends? Dan