* [Patch v3] 0/7] Remove mach-kirkwood
@ 2014-08-30 16:46 Andrew Lunn
2014-08-30 16:46 ` [Patch v3] 4/7] leds: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency Andrew Lunn
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lunn @ 2014-08-30 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Cooper
Cc: linux ARM, Andrew Lunn, Daniel Lezcano, Rafael J. Wysocki,
linux-pm, Tejun Heo, linux-ide, Zhang Rui, Richard Purdie,
linux-leds, Alessandro Zummo, rtc-linux, Wim Van Sebroeck,
linux-watchdog, Viresh Kumar
This is mostly a resend of these patches, removing mach-kirkwood. Not
all maintainers picked up there patches, which has resulted in some
dead kernel configuration in v3.17-rcX.
The patch set has been rebased on v3.17-rc2, and it is intended that
Jason Cooper will submit them for inclusion in an RC. Subsystem
maintainers do not need to do anything.
The last patch "cpufreq: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency" is new,
since what it is removing was added during v3.16-rcX. It follows the
pattern of all the other patches.
Andrew Lunn (7):
cpuidle: kirkwood: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
ata: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
thermal: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
leds: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
rtc: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
watchdog: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
cpufreq: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
drivers/ata/Kconfig | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 2 +-
drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm | 2 +-
drivers/leds/Kconfig | 4 ++--
drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 2 +-
drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 2 +-
drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 2 +-
7 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--
2.1.0
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>
Cc: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Patch v3] 4/7] leds: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
2014-08-30 16:46 [Patch v3] 0/7] Remove mach-kirkwood Andrew Lunn
@ 2014-08-30 16:46 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-09-01 13:56 ` [Patch v3] 0/7] Remove mach-kirkwood Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-09 15:10 ` Jason Cooper
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lunn @ 2014-08-30 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Cooper; +Cc: linux ARM, Andrew Lunn, Richard Purdie, linux-leds
mach-kirkwood has been removed, now that kirkwood lives in mach-mvebu.
Use MACH_KIRKWOOD which will be set when kirkwood is built as part of
mach-mvebu.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Acked-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>
Cc: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/leds/Kconfig | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/leds/Kconfig b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
index 8c96e2ddf43b..f6ef7bb2dc11 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ config LEDS_MC13783
config LEDS_NS2
tristate "LED support for Network Space v2 GPIO LEDs"
depends on LEDS_CLASS
- depends on ARCH_KIRKWOOD || MACH_KIRKWOOD
+ depends on MACH_KIRKWOOD
default y
help
This option enable support for the dual-GPIO LED found on the
@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ config LEDS_NS2
config LEDS_NETXBIG
tristate "LED support for Big Network series LEDs"
depends on LEDS_CLASS
- depends on ARCH_KIRKWOOD || MACH_KIRKWOOD
+ depends on MACH_KIRKWOOD
default y
help
This option enable support for LEDs found on the LaCie 2Big
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch v3] 0/7] Remove mach-kirkwood
2014-08-30 16:46 [Patch v3] 0/7] Remove mach-kirkwood Andrew Lunn
2014-08-30 16:46 ` [Patch v3] 4/7] leds: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency Andrew Lunn
@ 2014-09-01 13:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-01 14:03 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-09-09 15:10 ` Jason Cooper
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2014-09-01 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Lunn
Cc: Jason Cooper, linux ARM, Daniel Lezcano, linux-pm, Tejun Heo,
linux-ide, Zhang Rui, Richard Purdie, linux-leds,
Alessandro Zummo, rtc-linux, Wim Van Sebroeck, linux-watchdog,
Viresh Kumar
On Saturday, August 30, 2014 06:46:05 PM Andrew Lunn wrote:
> This is mostly a resend of these patches, removing mach-kirkwood. Not
> all maintainers picked up there patches, which has resulted in some
> dead kernel configuration in v3.17-rcX.
>
> The patch set has been rebased on v3.17-rc2, and it is intended that
> Jason Cooper will submit them for inclusion in an RC. Subsystem
> maintainers do not need to do anything.
>
> The last patch "cpufreq: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency" is new,
> since what it is removing was added during v3.16-rcX. It follows the
> pattern of all the other patches.
>
> Andrew Lunn (7):
> cpuidle: kirkwood: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> ata: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> thermal: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> leds: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> rtc: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> watchdog: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> cpufreq: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
I have no problems with these changes, but what exactly am I supposed to do?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch v3] 0/7] Remove mach-kirkwood
2014-09-01 13:56 ` [Patch v3] 0/7] Remove mach-kirkwood Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2014-09-01 14:03 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-09-01 23:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lunn @ 2014-09-01 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Andrew Lunn, Jason Cooper, linux ARM, Daniel Lezcano, linux-pm,
Tejun Heo, linux-ide, Zhang Rui, Richard Purdie, linux-leds,
Alessandro Zummo, rtc-linux, Wim Van Sebroeck, linux-watchdog,
Viresh Kumar
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 03:56:43PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, August 30, 2014 06:46:05 PM Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > This is mostly a resend of these patches, removing mach-kirkwood. Not
> > all maintainers picked up there patches, which has resulted in some
> > dead kernel configuration in v3.17-rcX.
> >
> > The patch set has been rebased on v3.17-rc2, and it is intended that
> > Jason Cooper will submit them for inclusion in an RC. Subsystem
> > maintainers do not need to do anything.
> >
> > The last patch "cpufreq: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency" is new,
> > since what it is removing was added during v3.16-rcX. It follows the
> > pattern of all the other patches.
> >
> > Andrew Lunn (7):
> > cpuidle: kirkwood: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> > ata: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> > thermal: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> > leds: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> > rtc: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> > watchdog: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> > cpufreq: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
>
> I have no problems with these changes, but what exactly am I supposed to do?
Jason will submit the whole series. So an Acked-by: would be nice.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch v3] 0/7] Remove mach-kirkwood
2014-09-01 14:03 ` Andrew Lunn
@ 2014-09-01 23:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2014-09-01 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Lunn
Cc: Jason Cooper, linux ARM, Daniel Lezcano, linux-pm, Tejun Heo,
linux-ide, Zhang Rui, Richard Purdie, linux-leds,
Alessandro Zummo, rtc-linux, Wim Van Sebroeck, linux-watchdog,
Viresh Kumar
On Monday, September 01, 2014 04:03:20 PM Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 03:56:43PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, August 30, 2014 06:46:05 PM Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > This is mostly a resend of these patches, removing mach-kirkwood. Not
> > > all maintainers picked up there patches, which has resulted in some
> > > dead kernel configuration in v3.17-rcX.
> > >
> > > The patch set has been rebased on v3.17-rc2, and it is intended that
> > > Jason Cooper will submit them for inclusion in an RC. Subsystem
> > > maintainers do not need to do anything.
> > >
> > > The last patch "cpufreq: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency" is new,
> > > since what it is removing was added during v3.16-rcX. It follows the
> > > pattern of all the other patches.
> > >
> > > Andrew Lunn (7):
> > > cpuidle: kirkwood: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> > > ata: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> > > thermal: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> > > leds: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> > > rtc: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> > > watchdog: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> > > cpufreq: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> >
> > I have no problems with these changes, but what exactly am I supposed to do?
>
> Jason will submit the whole series. So an Acked-by: would be nice.
OK, so please regard the cpuidle and cpufreq patches as ACKed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch v3] 0/7] Remove mach-kirkwood
2014-08-30 16:46 [Patch v3] 0/7] Remove mach-kirkwood Andrew Lunn
2014-08-30 16:46 ` [Patch v3] 4/7] leds: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency Andrew Lunn
2014-09-01 13:56 ` [Patch v3] 0/7] Remove mach-kirkwood Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2014-09-09 15:10 ` Jason Cooper
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jason Cooper @ 2014-09-09 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Lunn
Cc: linux ARM, Daniel Lezcano, Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-pm, Tejun Heo,
linux-ide, Zhang Rui, Richard Purdie, linux-leds,
Alessandro Zummo, rtc-linux, Wim Van Sebroeck, linux-watchdog,
Viresh Kumar
Andrew,
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 06:46:05PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> This is mostly a resend of these patches, removing mach-kirkwood. Not
> all maintainers picked up there patches, which has resulted in some
> dead kernel configuration in v3.17-rcX.
>
> The patch set has been rebased on v3.17-rc2, and it is intended that
> Jason Cooper will submit them for inclusion in an RC. Subsystem
> maintainers do not need to do anything.
>
> The last patch "cpufreq: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency" is new,
> since what it is removing was added during v3.16-rcX. It follows the
> pattern of all the other patches.
>
> Andrew Lunn (7):
> cpuidle: kirkwood: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> ata: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> thermal: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> leds: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> rtc: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> watchdog: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> cpufreq: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
>
> drivers/ata/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 2 +-
> drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm | 2 +-
> drivers/leds/Kconfig | 4 ++--
> drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 7 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Applied to mvebu/fixes for v3.17 with all the various Acks. Also,
please don't add the extra ']' in the Subject lines, 'git am' threw a
gasket on that so I had to manually edit before applying. Not a big
deal, just an fyi.
thx,
Jason.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-09 15:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-08-30 16:46 [Patch v3] 0/7] Remove mach-kirkwood Andrew Lunn
2014-08-30 16:46 ` [Patch v3] 4/7] leds: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency Andrew Lunn
2014-09-01 13:56 ` [Patch v3] 0/7] Remove mach-kirkwood Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-01 14:03 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-09-01 23:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-09 15:10 ` Jason Cooper
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).