Re: [PATCH 2/3] leds/pwm: Don't disable pwm when setting brightness to 0

["Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>]

On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 01:33:19PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 09:43:44PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > This fixes disabling the LED on i.MX28. The PWM hardware delays using
> > the newly set pwm-config until the beginning of a new period. It's very
> > likely that pwm_disable is called before the current period ends. In
> > case the LED was on brightness=max before the LED stays on because in
> > the disabled PWM block the period never ends.
> > 
> > Also only call pwm_enable only once in the probe call back and the
> > matching pwm_disable in .remove(). Moreover the pwm is explicitly
> > initialized to off.
> 
> While I do understand the reasoning behind this, if this is really the
> behaviour that we need then there's no use in having pwm_enable() and
> pwm_disable() at all. They can just be folded into pwm_get() and
> pwm_put(), respectively.
So after the first pwm_get the pwm starts with an unspecified duty
cycle? That's not that nice, is it?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |