From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Bryan Wu" <cooloney@gmail.com>,
"Richard Purdie" <rpurdie@rpsys.net>,
"Jacek Anaszewski" <j.anaszewski@samsung.com>,
linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
"Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
"Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard" <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
"Tomi Valkeinen" <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
"Doug Anderson" <dianders@google.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Maxime Ripard" <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] pwm: add support for atomic update
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 21:49:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150720214913.73c47fa6@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150720171950.GE11162@sirena.org.uk>
Hi Mark,
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 18:19:50 +0100
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:31:57PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>
> > - dropped pwm-regulator patches (should be submitted separately)
>
> I think the second patch needs to go in with this series doesn't it? It
> was just the enable one that was good to go immediately IIRC.
I was planning on submitting those two patches after the PWM changes
have been merged, but you're right, maybe we should think about a proper
way to smoothly get all of them in the same release.
I have rebased my work on top your regulator/topic/pwm branch containing
Lee's work [1].
Note that patch 1 has changed a bit to take Lee's additions into
account.
Thierry, could you create a branch based on Mark's regulator/topic/pwm
branch ?
If everybody agrees on the solution I'll send a v3 rebasing my work on
top of this topic branch.
Best Regards,
Boris
[1]https://github.com/bbrezillon/linux-rk/tree/atomic-pwm-v3
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-20 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-20 15:31 [PATCH v2 00/10] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] pwm: move the enabled/disabled info to pwm_state struct Boris Brezillon
[not found] ` <1437406327-6207-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-20 15:31 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] pwm: introduce default period and polarity concepts Boris Brezillon
2015-10-06 10:09 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-07-20 15:31 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] pwm: define a new pwm_state struct Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to pwm_set_period Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] pwm: declare a default PWM state Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] pwm: add the PWM initial state retrieval infra Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] pwm: add the core infrastructure to allow atomic update Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] pwm: add information about polarity, duty cycle and period to debugfs Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] pwm: rockchip: add initial state retrieval Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] pwm: rockchip: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] pwm: " Mark Brown
2015-07-20 19:49 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2015-07-20 20:08 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-20 20:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-25 6:36 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-08-17 7:18 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150720214913.73c47fa6@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cooloney@gmail.com \
--cc=dianders@google.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=j.anaszewski@samsung.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).