From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: Delete obsolete Versatile driver Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 14:14:02 +0200 Message-ID: <20170504121402.GB32103@amd> References: <20170504120308.6738-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw" Return-path: Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:53918 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753109AbdEDMOF (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2017 08:14:05 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170504120308.6738-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> Sender: linux-leds-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Jacek Anaszewski , Richard Purdie , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org --tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu 2017-05-04 14:03:08, Linus Walleij wrote: > All users of the Versatile LED driver are deleted and replaced > with the very generic leds-syscon. Delete the old driver. If someone has LEDS_VERSATILE selected, he'll be unhappy if we apply first. Are you sure no _users_ have LEDS_VERSATILE selected? Should we give them some kind of warning? (#warning, printk, ...?) Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlkLGwoACgkQMOfwapXb+vIiXwCguqXtSUtqmhmiBo0KGsDCn6g6 WWoAn1zZ1p1uGKIIh98prrJKW+rqn/W4 =PaBY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw--