From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Introduce audio-mute LED trigger (and conversions to it) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 22:22:13 +0100 Message-ID: <20181128212212.GE20670@amd> References: <20181126171126.20280-1-tiwai@suse.de> <20181127084418.GA20504@amd> <20181128111806.cb3cncpjeq73sptg@pali> <20181128122505.GA1193@amd> <8bb45cc6-9f98-9fed-9676-7f1429328c4a@gmail.com> <20181128203410.GA20670@amd> <20181128204612.l3bayhop4qmep2hj@pali> <0ed37870-c7b6-fd6b-2f6e-7325fdde3629@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6175940629705471447==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <0ed37870-c7b6-fd6b-2f6e-7325fdde3629@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Jacek Anaszewski Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Ayman Bagabas , Takashi Iwai , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Hui Wang , ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= , Andy Shevchenko , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org --===============6175940629705471447== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cPi+lWm09sJ+d57q" Content-Disposition: inline --cPi+lWm09sJ+d57q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > > If external USB keyboard is identified as "input7" device, then > > "input7::mute" is a good name for mute key. But "sys::mute" does not say > > anything to which device or hardware it belongs nor does not solve > > problem that which device/driver/subsystem should have privilege to take > > this "sys" name. >=20 > How about just "platform" for the LEDs being part of the device > on which the system is running? "platform" works for me. Are we in agreement that this name will be used for all similar LEDs, as long as they are on the "main box" of the device, no matter if they are connected using acpi, gpio, i2c, ...? Should we start Documentation file explaining common names we want people to use? Thanks, Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --cPi+lWm09sJ+d57q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlv/BwQACgkQMOfwapXb+vKb2ACfZJfWC+Arq4KD0vrx1ko3Sca0 kDIAoI+CXAJl3Ca37mFYly/Hhi+Ydz6H =DHC4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cPi+lWm09sJ+d57q-- --===============6175940629705471447== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --===============6175940629705471447==--