From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Masney Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: backlight: add lm3630a bindings Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 19:04:05 -0400 Message-ID: <20190401230405.GA7877@basecamp> References: <20190401103034.21062-1-masneyb@onstation.org> <20190401103034.21062-3-masneyb@onstation.org> <20190401213926.GD14681@amd> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190401213926.GD14681@amd> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: lee.jones@linaro.org, daniel.thompson@linaro.org, jingoohan1@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dmurphy@ti.com, jonathan@marek.ca List-Id: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 11:39:26PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Mon 2019-04-01 06:30:33, Brian Masney wrote: > > Add new backlight bindings for the TI LM3630A dual-string white LED. > > > > Signed-off-by: Brian Masney > > --- > > .../leds/backlight/lm3630a-backlight.yaml | 112 > ++++++++++++++++++ > > What is that? Is it future of all the bindings? > > Up to device tree people, I guess, but... Yes, this is the future format of the bindings so that automated validation can be performed. See Documentation/devicetree/writing-schema.md. Brian