From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@ti.com>
Cc: jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tomi.valkeinen@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] leds: Add control of the voltage/current regulator to the LED core
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 13:37:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191125163738.GC3816@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191021174751.4421-3-jjhiblot@ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3097 bytes --]
Hi!
> A LED is usually powered by a voltage/current regulator. Let the LED core
> know about it. This allows the LED core to turn on or off the power supply
> as needed.
>
> Because turning ON/OFF a regulator might block, it is not done
> synchronously but done in a workqueue. Turning ON the regulator is
> always
How will this interact with LEDs that can be used from atomic context?
> +static ssize_t regulator_auto_off_store(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t size)
> +{
> + struct led_classdev *led_cdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + ssize_t ret = size;
> + bool auto_off;
> +
> + if (strncmp(buf, "enable\n", size) == 0)
> + auto_off = true;
> + else if (strncmp(buf, "disable\n", size) == 0)
> + auto_off = false;
> + else
> + return -EINVAL;
Sounds like device power management to me. Is it compatible with that?
> @@ -135,6 +203,8 @@ static void set_brightness_delayed(struct work_struct *ws)
> (led_cdev->flags & LED_HW_PLUGGABLE)))
> dev_err(led_cdev->dev,
> "Setting an LED's brightness failed (%d)\n", ret);
> +
> + led_handle_regulator(led_cdev);
> }
>
You only modify set_brigthness_delays, so this will not work at all
for non-blocking LEDs, right?
> static void led_set_software_blink(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
> @@ -189,6 +259,7 @@ static void led_blink_setup(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
> void led_init_core(struct led_classdev *led_cdev)
> {
> INIT_WORK(&led_cdev->set_brightness_work, set_brightness_delayed);
> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&led_cdev->reg_off_work, turn_off_regulator_delayed);
>
Could this re-use the workqueue? Many systems will not need
regulators, so this is overhead...
> + /*
> + * the regulator must be turned off. This cannot be
Use "The", and fix double spaces between must and be.
> + } else if (regulator_on && old == REG_R_OFF_U_OFF) {
> + /*
> + * the regulator must be enabled. This cannot be here
"The"
> + /*
> + * small optimization. Cancel the work that had been started
"Small."
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * The regulator state tracks 2 boolean variables:
> + * - the state of regulator (or more precisely the state required by
> + * led core layer, as many users can interact with the same regulator).
> + * It is tracked by bit 0.
> + * - the state last asked-for by the LED user. It is tracked by bit 1.
> + */
> +#define REG_R_ON BIT(0)
> +#define REG_U_ON BIT(1)
> +
> +enum { REG_R_OFF_U_OFF = 0,
> + REG_R_ON_U_OFF = REG_R_ON,
> + REG_R_OFF_U_ON = REG_U_ON,
> + REG_R_ON_U_ON = REG_R_ON | REG_U_ON
> +};
That's quite weird use of enum.
> +++ b/include/linux/leds.h
> @@ -149,6 +149,15 @@ struct led_classdev {
>
> /* Ensures consistent access to the LED Flash Class device */
> struct mutex led_access;
> +
> + /* regulator */
"Regulator".
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-04 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-21 17:47 [PATCH v7 0/2] Subject: [PATCH v7 0/2] leds: Add control of the voltage/current regulator to the LED core Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2019-10-21 17:47 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: document the "power-supply" property Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2019-10-24 22:51 ` Rob Herring
2019-10-21 17:47 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] leds: Add control of the voltage/current regulator to the LED core Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2019-12-04 12:37 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2020-04-24 12:47 ` Tomi Valkeinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191125163738.GC3816@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
--cc=jjhiblot@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).