From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0BFC4338F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94CD560EB2 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232231AbhG1Kfz (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 06:35:55 -0400 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz ([46.255.230.98]:57190 "EHLO jabberwock.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231704AbhG1Kfy (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 06:35:54 -0400 Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id A50941C0B7C; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:35:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:35:52 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Linux LED Subsystem , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Walleij , Geert Uytterhoeven , Hans de Goede , Pavel Machek , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: LED subsystem lagging maintenance Message-ID: <20210728103551.GA31304@amd> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > I have noticed that in the last couple of cycles the LED subsystem is > a bit laggish in terms of maintenance (*). I think it's time that > someone can help Pavel to sort things out. >=20 > In any case, I wonder if we have any kind of procedure for what to do > in such cases. Do we need to assume that the subsystem is in a > (pre-)orphaned state? If so, who is the best to take care of patch > flow? To be honest, patches were not applied because they were not that important to begin with, because of lacking explanation, and because you pushed a bit too hard. Yes, I'm quite busy in -rc1 to -rc3 timeframe with stable reviews. No, LED subsystem is not orphaned. Best regards, Pavel --=20 http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAmEBMwcACgkQMOfwapXb+vKyBACdHHzrt4xTc8c09wb+t5kxdxzp 0hMAnjkyngryJ3F3XiI94JVCmstwlrho =u0Dy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx--