From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7259C4338F for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 08:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF1260FF2 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 08:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230176AbhHTIHK (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2021 04:07:10 -0400 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz ([46.255.230.98]:38010 "EHLO jabberwock.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230099AbhHTIHK (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2021 04:07:10 -0400 Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id C2AF31C0B80; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 10:06:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 10:06:31 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Vadim Pasternak Cc: "linux-leds@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: pending patches Message-ID: <20210820080631.GA22757@amd> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > I have two pending patches: > https://patches.linaro.org/patch/432324/ from 2021-05-07 I don't understand this one. Are these normal single-color LEDs, or is it some kind of weird red/orange/amber/green combination exposed as single LED? > https://patches.linaro.org/patch/403538/ from 2021-03-16, which has been = re-sent. In this case, I don't think i2c bus number is suitable way to identify add-on card. Having some way of identifying add-on cards makes sense (as we'll probably have other vendors having "fault" or "activity" light on their cards), but those boards will not neccessarily have i2c on them. Best regards, Pavel --=20 http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAmEfYoYACgkQMOfwapXb+vIodACff8AL9el4wMIIxOffcjoe5KXr Cp0AoINLeCXD1W8oVF0d1bA/Sxa3ssEY =21N9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK--