From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Mert Seftali <mertsftl@gmail.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@kernel.org>,
Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: lp5860: Return an error for an out-of-range 'reg' property
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 12:55:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260618115500.GG1672911@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612201637.197608-1-mertsftl@gmail.com>
On Fri, 12 Jun 2026, Mert Seftali wrote:
> When fwnode_property_read_u32() succeeds but the channel number exceeds
> LP5860_MAX_LED, ret is 0. The error path then passes 0 to dev_err_probe()
> and returns 0, so an out-of-range "reg" value is silently treated as
> success instead of being rejected.
>
> Set ret to -EINVAL in that case so the invalid channel is reported and
> propagated as an error.
>
> Fixes: 3daf2c4ef82b ("leds: Add support for TI LP5860 LED driver chip")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202605210624.3gcr3prk-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Mert Seftali <mertsftl@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/leds/rgb/leds-lp5860-core.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/rgb/leds-lp5860-core.c b/drivers/leds/rgb/leds-lp5860-core.c
> index fd0e2f6e6e0f..9eeb01b3e56a 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/rgb/leds-lp5860-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/rgb/leds-lp5860-core.c
> @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ static int lp5860_iterate_subleds(struct lp5860_led *led, struct led_init_data *
>
> ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(led_node, "reg", &channel);
> if (ret < 0 || channel > LP5860_MAX_LED) {
Whilst we're hear, let's split this out. If 'fwnode_property_read_u32()'
fails, 'channel' is not populated. While short-circuit evaluation protects
us here, separating the error paths would allow us to use the preferred
'if (ret)' check instead of 'if (ret < 0)'. It would also let us provide a
more accurate error message, as 'reg' is not missing when it is simply out of
range.
> + if (ret >= 0)
> + ret = -EINVAL;
Avoid this nested check entirely by assigning 'ret = -EINVAL' directly
within a separate block for the out-of-range check. This would keep the
flow a bit cleaner and easier to follow.
> dev_err_probe(led->chip->dev, ret,
> "%pfwP: 'reg' property is missing. Skipping.\n", led_node);
> fwnode_handle_put(led_node);
> --
> 2.54.0
>
--
Lee Jones
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-18 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 20:16 [PATCH] leds: lp5860: Return an error for an out-of-range 'reg' property Mert Seftali
2026-06-18 11:55 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2026-06-18 14:25 ` Mert Seftali
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260618115500.GG1672911@google.com \
--to=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mertsftl@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox