Linux LED subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rong Zhang" <i@rong.moe>
Cc: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, lee@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 05/11] leds: turris-omnia: trigger: Implement offloaded() and declare hw_control_trigger
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2026 17:13:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260719171308.741ED1F00AC4@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260719-leds-trigger-hw-changed-v3-5-5fb55722e36e@rong.moe>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Calling `devm_led_trigger_register()` on a statically allocated global `struct led_trigger omnia_hw_trigger` causes list corruption and potential kernel panics if multiple driver instances are probed.
--

--- Patch [5]: [PATCH RFC v3 05/11] leds: turris-omnia: trigger: Implement offloaded() and declare hw_control_trigger ---
commit 2d28a7cfbe3bd11a356a1c04d42e4a480011bb29
Author: Rong Zhang <i@rong.moe>

leds: turris-omnia: trigger: Implement offloaded() and declare hw_control_trigger

"omnia-mcu" is a private hardware control trigger which always stays in
hardware control mode. Implement offloaded() callback with its return
value to be always true to reflect this.

> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-turris-omnia.c b/drivers/leds/leds-turris-omnia.c
> index ed6a47bbb44f9..32d40d176d3f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-turris-omnia.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-turris-omnia.c

[ ... ]

>  static struct led_trigger omnia_hw_trigger = {
>  	.name		= "omnia-mcu",
>  	.activate	= omnia_hwtrig_activate,
>  	.deactivate	= omnia_hwtrig_deactivate,
> +	.offloaded	= omnia_hwtrig_offloaded,
>  	.trigger_type	= &omnia_hw_trigger_type,
>  };

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does calling devm_led_trigger_register()
on this statically allocated global structure cause list corruption if
multiple driver instances are probed?

If a privileged user instantiates a second instance of the driver on the
same I2C bus via sysfs:

drivers/leds/leds-turris-omnia.c:omnia_leds_probe() {
    ...
    ret = devm_led_trigger_register(dev, &omnia_hw_trigger);
    ...
}

The led_trigger_register() core function unconditionally executes
INIT_LIST_HEAD() and spin_lock_init() before checking if the trigger is
already registered:

drivers/leds/led-triggers.c:led_trigger_register() {
    ...
    spin_lock_init(&trig->leddev_list_lock);
    INIT_LIST_HEAD(&trig->led_cdevs);
    ...
}

Could this destroy the lock and the list of attached LEDs for the active
trigger, creating dangling pointers that lead to use-after-free or panics
during teardown before the duplicate name check returns -EEXIST?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260719-leds-trigger-hw-changed-v3-0-5fb55722e36e@rong.moe?part=5

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-19 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-18 17:05 [PATCH RFC v3 00/11] leds: Add support for hardware-initiated hardware control trigger transition Rong Zhang
2026-07-18 17:05 ` [PATCH RFC v3 01/11] leds: Move led_trigger_is_hw_controlled() to the right place Rong Zhang
2026-07-19 17:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 17:05 ` [PATCH RFC v3 02/11] leds: class: Remove hardware control trigger when writing brightness Rong Zhang
2026-07-19 17:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 17:05 ` [PATCH RFC v3 03/11] leds: trigger: Add offloaded() callback and provide trigger_may_offload attribute Rong Zhang
2026-07-19 17:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 17:05 ` [PATCH RFC v3 04/11] leds: cros_ec: trigger: Implement offloaded() callback Rong Zhang
2026-07-19 17:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 17:05 ` [PATCH RFC v3 05/11] leds: turris-omnia: trigger: Implement offloaded() and declare hw_control_trigger Rong Zhang
2026-07-19 17:13   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-18 17:05 ` [PATCH RFC v3 06/11] leds: trigger: netdev: Implement offloaded() callback Rong Zhang
2026-07-19 17:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 17:05 ` [PATCH RFC v3 07/11] leds: trigger: Enforce strict checks in led_trigger_is_hw_controlled() Rong Zhang
2026-07-19 17:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 17:05 ` [PATCH RFC v3 08/11] leds: trigger: Add led_trigger_notify_hw_control_changed() interface Rong Zhang
2026-07-19 17:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 17:05 ` [PATCH RFC v3 09/11] platform/x86: ideapad-laptop: Decouple hardware & classdev brightness for keyboard backlight Rong Zhang
2026-07-19 17:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 17:05 ` [PATCH RFC v3 10/11] platform/x86: ideapad-laptop: Serialize keyboard backlight notifications Rong Zhang
2026-07-19 17:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 17:05 ` [PATCH RFC v3 11/11] platform/x86: ideapad-laptop: Fully support auto keyboard backlight Rong Zhang
2026-07-19 17:13   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260719171308.741ED1F00AC4@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=i@rong.moe \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox