From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] leds: core: add struct device_node pointer to the struct led_classdev Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 23:27:55 +0100 Message-ID: <431cabc7-2ffe-9f8d-01fc-616978f12821@gmail.com> References: <20170227222300.2060-1-zajec5@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mail-lf0-f68.google.com ([209.85.215.68]:33004 "EHLO mail-lf0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751888AbdB0W3i (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2017 17:29:38 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-f68.google.com with SMTP id j2so7134108lfe.0 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:27:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20170227222300.2060-1-zajec5@gmail.com> Sender: linux-leds-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org To: Richard Purdie , Jacek Anaszewski , Pavel Machek Cc: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= On 02/27/2017 11:22 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > From: Rafał Miłecki > > This allows every led_classdev_register user to set of_node before > calling that function. Thanks to this LEDs core code may access DT node > during LED registration (e.g. to read extra info). > > A small disadvantage of this imlementation is keeping of_node pointer in > two places: struct led_classdev and struct device. > Another solutions were: > 1) Passing pointer with a led_classdev_register call > This would require changing & complicating the API. > 2) Moving allocation part of led_classdev_register to separated function > This would make registering LED even more complicated. > > Having duplicated pointer semms like a reasonable trade-off. > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki > --- > drivers/leds/led-class.c | 1 + > include/linux/leds.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/leds/led-class.c b/drivers/leds/led-class.c > index 326ee6e925a2..9db9d05e4832 100644 > --- a/drivers/leds/led-class.c > +++ b/drivers/leds/led-class.c > @@ -199,6 +199,7 @@ int led_classdev_register(struct device *parent, struct led_classdev *led_cdev) > led_cdev, led_cdev->groups, "%s", name); > if (IS_ERR(led_cdev->dev)) > return PTR_ERR(led_cdev->dev); > + led_cdev->dev->of_node = led_cdev->of_node; > > if (ret) > dev_warn(parent, "Led %s renamed to %s due to name collision", > diff --git a/include/linux/leds.h b/include/linux/leds.h > index 569cb531094c..7dc4a679f376 100644 > --- a/include/linux/leds.h > +++ b/include/linux/leds.h > @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ struct led_classdev { > unsigned long *delay_off); > > struct device *dev; > + struct device_node *of_node; > const struct attribute_group **groups; > > struct list_head node; /* LED Device list */ > Sorry Jacek, I used your old e-mail accidentally. Hope you got this patchset.