From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vasant Hegde Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] leds/powernv: Add driver for PowerNV platform Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:17:50 +0530 Message-ID: <553E3E06.6070605@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20150422234509.626d9dc7@ja.home> <55388254.4000606@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150423161342.55e9ac8f@ja.home> <1430086038.16571.78.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <553DE41A.5070703@samsung.com> <1430128435.16571.110.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <553E1A65.5080409@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from e28smtp08.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.8]:38855 "EHLO e28smtp08.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964835AbbD0NsC (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2015 09:48:02 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp08.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:17:59 +0530 Received: from d28relay03.in.ibm.com (d28relay03.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.60]) by d28dlp01.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB82E0056 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:20:39 +0530 (IST) Received: from d28av04.in.ibm.com (d28av04.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.66]) by d28relay03.in.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t3RDlska63504394 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:17:54 +0530 Received: from d28av04.in.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d28av04.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t3RDlqTO025826 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:17:53 +0530 In-Reply-To: <553E1A65.5080409@samsung.com> Sender: linux-leds-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org To: Jacek Anaszewski , Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com, cooloney@gmail.com, rpurdie@rpsys.net, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com On 04/27/2015 04:45 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > On 04/27/2015 11:53 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >> On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 09:24 +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >>> I was not aware that some other entity than the driver could be >>> interested in the information provided by DT node. I will no longer >>> object, provided that we will get an ack from DT maintainer. >> Jacket, >> My understanding is that we no longer need bindings to be accepted by DT >> maintainers. > > I've just skimmed through the patches in > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc and they indeed don't have > acks from DT maintainers. Sure.. I have addressed all other issues we discussed earlier. Will respin v4 soon. > >> That being said, I would like to review this one before it is accepted, >> as I haven't had a chance to do so yet :-) (I was mostly responding to >> you, I haven't caught up with the full thread yet). >> >> Please wait for an ack from myself or Michael Ellerman (the two powerpc >> maintainers). Either that or provide your ack and we'll merge it via our >> tree if we are happy with it. > > Since this driver is for LED subsystem it should better go via leds tree. > Sure.. Will send v4 and request benh/mpe to review/ack from powerpc side. -Vasant